On 21 October 2012 23:13, SomeoneElse <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lists@mail.atownsend.org.uk" target="_blank">lists@mail.atownsend.org.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Personally, I'd say that if the process requires the duplication of exactly the same value as is already in "name" that the process is flawed...</blockquote></div><br>I think it can be useful because the article name isn't always just the OSM object's "name" value. Leaving it blank could either mean one should just use the "name" value, or that nobody has paid it any attention. Better to make it explicit.<div>
<br></div><div>Regards,</div><div>Tom<br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><a href="http://tom.acrewoods.net">http://tom.acrewoods.net</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/tom_chance">http://twitter.com/tom_chance</a><br>
</div>