<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
Dave F,<br>
<br>
<blockquote class=" cite" id="mid_514F04D7_6070309_madasafish_com"
cite="mid:514F04D7.6070309@madasafish.com" type="cite"> Please
read the link on multipolygons:<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multipolygon">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multipolygon</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote>
Thanks for this link - there is always something to learn!<br>
<br>
<blockquote class=" cite" id="mid_514F04D7_6070309_madasafish_com"
cite="mid:514F04D7.6070309@madasafish.com" type="cite"> By making
your edits you now incorrectly made Rydal Water a part of the
River Rothay multi-polygon. <br>
<br>
</blockquote>
Oops - I should have picked that up. I will correct it.<br>
<blockquote class=" cite" id="mid_514F04D7_6070309_madasafish_com"
cite="mid:514F04D7.6070309@madasafish.com" type="cite"> The
natural=water tag is included in the multi-polygon. Adding it to
the way is an unnecessary & confusing duplication. To avoid
this confusion I often put a note tag explaining where the data is
stored.<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
Good idea.<br>
<blockquote class=" cite" id="mid_514F04D7_6070309_madasafish_com"
cite="mid:514F04D7.6070309@madasafish.com" type="cite"> Remember
that just because you think the potlach editor is displaying data
incorrectly it doesn't actually mean the the data is wrong. In
this example the lake doesn't have to be shaded blue to be
correct. It's how the renderers handle it that matters.<br>
</blockquote>
It's a pity if the default on-line editor renders 'incorrect'
tagging in a more intuitive way than 'correct' tagging. This is not
very helpful to the less experienced mapper (such as me).<br>
<br>
Thanks again for your advice.<br>
<br>
Roger<br>
-- <br>
<div class="moz-signature">
<hr style="width:50%;float:left;"><br>
Roger Calvert<br>
<hr style="width:50%;float:left;"></div>
</body>
</html>