<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 24/03/2013 11:38, Nick Whitelegg
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:OF74E61B40.98F300D2-ON80257B38.003FF9AF-80257B38.003FF9AF@solent.ac.uk"
      type="cite"><font face="Default Sans
        Serif,Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif" size="2">
        <div><br>
        </div>
        1. Didn't appear on Freemap when I updated the data earlier
        today (first update since the 64-bit ID issue in Feb)</font></blockquote>
    <br>
    Well, to be honest, there's your problem. Freemap, to me, is a bit
    of a joke.<br>
    <br>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:OF74E61B40.98F300D2-ON80257B38.003FF9AF-80257B38.003FF9AF@solent.ac.uk"
      type="cite"><font face="Default Sans
        Serif,Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif" size="2">
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>2. Went onto Potlatch and the natural=water polygon seemed
          to be missing in both cases.</div>
      </font></blockquote>
    <br>
    No, they're in the multipolygon. 
    <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multipolygon">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multipolygon</a><br>
    <br>
    Dave F.<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:OF74E61B40.98F300D2-ON80257B38.003FF9AF-80257B38.003FF9AF@solent.ac.uk"
      type="cite"><font face="Default Sans
        Serif,Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif" size="2">
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Other lakes in the Lake District all ok.</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div><br>
          <font color="#990099">-----"Dave F."
            <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:davefox@madasafish.com"><davefox@madasafish.com></a> wrote: -----</font>
          <div style="padding-left:5px;">
            <div
              style="padding-right:0px;padding-left:5px;border-left:solid
              black 2px;">From: "Dave F." <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:davefox@madasafish.com"><davefox@madasafish.com></a><br>
              Date: 24/03/2013 11:11AM<br>
              Cc: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:talk-gb@openstreetmap.org">talk-gb@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
              Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Windermere and Rydal Water -
              missing<br>
              <br>
              <div><font face="Courier New,Courier,monospace" size="3">What
                  do you think is wrong with them?<br>
                  <br>
                  They're visible in mapnik, & most ways haven't
                  been edited since <br>
                  January. There does appear to be a bit of pointless
                  overuse of <br>
                  multipolygons to represent riverbanks, but nothing
                  that makes them <br>
                  'missing'.<br>
                  <br>
                  Dave F.<br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  _______________________________________________<br>
                  Talk-GB mailing list<br>
                  <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org">Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
                  <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb</a><br>
                </font></div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </font>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>