<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN">
<html><body style='font-family: Verdana,Geneva,sans-serif'>
<p>The NP areas do have some kind of individual raison d'etre because the parish/town council areas are only used as a starting point. They can exclude parts of their area if they wish, and by agreement with adjoining authorities, include additional areas from neighbouring parishes where that makes sense for planning purposes. For example (all in Mid Sussex district, West Sussex), <span>Lindfield and Lindfield Rural have a shared NP, an amalgamation of two parish councils; and <span>Ansty Staplefield has donated an urbanised part of its territory to Horsham.</span></span></p>
<p><span><span>Colin</span></span></p>
<p>On 2013-03-24 14:28, SomeoneElse wrote:</p>
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding-left:5px; border-left:#1010ff 2px solid; margin-left:5px; width:100%">
<pre>Colin Smale wrote:</pre>
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding-left:5px; border-left:#1010ff 2px solid; margin-left:5px; width:100%">What do others think?</blockquote>
<pre>Thanks for the heads-up. This sort of import is exactly the sort of
thing that should have been discussed on this list first.
As I read it (from <a href="https://www.gov.uk/neighbourhood-planning">https://www.gov.uk/neighbourhood-planning</a> )
boundaries are only really going to be relevant in unparished areas
where a neighbourhood plan is established - elsewhere it looks like
existing parish and town coucils will do (actually in fact are already
doing) this.<br /><br /><br /></pre>
</blockquote>
<div> </div>
</body></html>