<div dir="ltr">Nice find, I've contacted them to ask if they would like to add them to OSM, or publish the measurements somewhere under the ODBL.<div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div>Tom</div></div><div class="gmail_extra">
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 30 April 2013 08:05, Kevin Peat <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:k@k3v.eu" target="_blank">k@k3v.eu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im"><p dir="ltr"><br>
On 29 Apr 2013 22:01, "Rovastar" <<a href="mailto:rovastar@hotmail.com" target="_blank">rovastar@hotmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Great however the OSM referenced has been shoehorned in there (not<br>
> complaining though), as the cartographers mentioned finding the new 2000ft<br>
> "mountain" just seemed to use Ordinance Survey....notably the wrong height<br>
> appears on OSM and not updated. :(<br>
><br>
> <a href="http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=54.81021&lon=-2.60709&zoom=16&layers=M" target="_blank">http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=54.81021&lon=-2.60709&zoom=16&layers=M</a><br>
></p>
</div><p dir="ltr">What's with the feet, I thought 'ele' was supposed to be in metres?</p><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
<p dir="ltr">Kevin</p>
</font></span><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-GB mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org">Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb" target="_blank">http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><a href="http://tom.acrewoods.net">http://tom.acrewoods.net</a> <a href="http://twitter.com/tom_chance">http://twitter.com/tom_chance</a>
</div>