<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 15/05/2015 10:22, Jason Woollacott
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:DUB109-DS432E2CFA5AD1D8172EDFD3BAC70@phx.gbl"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; COLOR:
#000000">
<div>Looks like there has been an issue with changeset
30821940 Which seems to have added the A30 through the
whole of Cornwall on an incorrect route. </div>
<div> </div>
<div><a moz-do-not-send="true"
title="https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30821940"
href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30821940">https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30821940</a></div>
<div> </div>
<div>Didn’t want to back this change out myself, as not sure
what else it changed.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Any thoughts or comments..</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Their other changeset has a couple of odd deletions in it too, and
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/345001740">https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/345001740</a> .<br>
<br>
I'd suggest that a local mapper get in touch with them (via
changeset comments perhaps?) and try and figure out what they were
trying to do (as ever, looks like "cockup" rather than
"conspiracy"). At first glance there don't appear to be an v1 items
worth saving in these changesets, but it'd be nice to check. I'm
happy to try a JOSM revert a bit later if no-one else steps forward,
but after 10 days I suspect a delay of an extra half-day or so won't
cause the revert too many extra problems.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
<br>
Andy<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>