<div dir="ltr">Actually, I take it back.... Andy, after pointing me at <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/481194/c-notice-201401.pdf">https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/481194/c-notice-201401.pdf</a> I agree that you are quite right.<div><div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Sat, 30 Jan 2016 at 19:02 David Woolley <<a href="mailto:forums@david-woolley.me.uk">forums@david-woolley.me.uk</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On 30/01/16 18:03, Jez Nicholson wrote:<br>
> Andy, I respectfully beg to differ. Crown copyright does expire after 50<br>
> years but owners of scans claim 'sweat of the brow' grants them<br>
> copyright of the images made. Even the people at NPE Maps claim it<br>
> <a href="http://www.npemap.org.uk/tileLicence.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.npemap.org.uk/tileLicence.html</a> but they renounce any claim on<br>
> derived data.<br>
<br>
<br>
However, I believe that it will, at most, create copyrights in the<br>
imagery, not database rights.<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-GB mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb</a><br>
</blockquote></div></div></div></div></div>