<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 16/08/2016 17:28, Colin Smale wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:0b86883eb5098e3ee08ba558ee68882d@xs4all.nl"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<p>Dave, if the is_in values are based on common usage rather than
administrative reality, then it would actually be correct to
leave them unchanged.</p>
</blockquote>
<br>
If a better way of doing something is created then the old methods
become redundant & should be removed for the reasons Andy Allan
mentioned in a previous post in this thread. Sarah Hoffmann's reply
in the Talk thread I posted clearly says is_in:* "is unnecessary" <br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:0b86883eb5098e3ee08ba558ee68882d@xs4all.nl"
type="cite">
<p>The point I am trying to make, is that I see a need to support
a variety of addressing/location systems, which are all correct
in their own way, but useful for different things.<br>
</p>
</blockquote>
<br>
As far as I can see is_in:* is used for the same things as
boundaries, but is less efficient & prone to errors. <br>
<br>
Are you aware of any utilities that use is_in:*?<br>
<br>
Cheers<br>
Dave F. <br>
</body>
</html>