<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"></head><body>
<div><br></div><div>Andy</div><div><br></div><div>That's a very good point. I suspect that I mis-remembered the use of crossing_ref=* (used with highway=crossing + crossing=*) as just "ref".</div><div><br></div><div>brand=legible_london seems a much better fit, particularly as it makes it seem less of an assertion about the actual legibility of the map (as noted in an earlier comment).</div><div><br></div><div>Perhaps also operator=* for the borough responsible, or TfL as appropriate? </div><div><br></div><div id="composer_signature"><div>-- </div><div><div>Robert Skedgell (rskedgell)</div></div></div><br><br>-------- Original message --------<br>From: Andy Allan <gravitystorm@gmail.com> <br>Date: 10/01/2017 15:10 (GMT+00:00) <br>To: Robert Skedgell <rob@hubris.org.uk> <br>Cc: Talk-GB <talk-gb@openstreetmap.org> <br>Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Legible London signs - tagging suggestions <br><br>On 10 January 2017 at 07:54, Robert Skedgell <rob@hubris.org.uk> wrote:<br><br>> ref=legible_london<br><br>I would only use the ref= tag if there is a reference code for each<br>installation, e.g. if the totem has a displayed reference like "A01"<br>designed for users to see. From the pictures I don't think that they<br>do, and if they did, I would expect it to be a reference for internal<br>use - i.e. official_ref=<br><br>Think of it like bus stops (ref=C) or road numbers (ref=A204). Would<br>it make sense if I was to render a map with an icon for the<br>information point, with the reference shown underneath?<br><br>I would suggest brand=legible_london as an alternative, but there<br>might be other options too.<br><br>Thanks,<br>Andy<br> </body></html>