<div dir="ltr"><div><div>While we're on this subject, it isn't readily apparent to me which map base the Guardian is using for this campaign. We should be lobbying them to use an open source rather than an online POPS which does suggest a delicious irony. But if they're using OSM then good for them. I've already raised this with them but not received a reply<br><br></div>Regards<br><br></div>Brian<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 4 August 2017 at 14:16, Dan S <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:danstowell+osm@gmail.com" target="_blank">danstowell+osm@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">2017-08-04 13:20 GMT+01:00 SK53 <<a href="mailto:sk53.osm@gmail.com">sk53.osm@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
> Personally I'm rather more interested in mapping POPS as they are becoming<br>
> an issue in larger cities.<br>
<br>
</span>We could map the boundaries of POPS through a systematic procedure of<br>
standing in specific spots, looking like we don't want to buy<br>
anything, and waiting for the security guards' reaction?<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
Dan<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Talk-GB mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org">Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.<wbr>org/listinfo/talk-gb</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>