<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>Its my personal opinion (which I believe is clear from the text),
but given that the attribution terms are essentially the same as
for the ODbL, a licence we just happen to have a lot of experience
with :-), it is fairly clear that we would be contradicting our
stance on acceptable attribution of OSM if the LWG came to a
different formal conclusion.</p>
<p>But I can naturally table a formal compatibility determination, I
just can't guarantee that it will be available quickly given that
we are rather busy with GDPR related work.</p>
<p>Simon<br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 15.02.2018 um 12:06 schrieb Brian
Prangle:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAECtZzDWcesxQjjZEpU8JmXnn8ykShNjJ+LyvY=GJT70pqmtTQ@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">Thanks for that Simon - is that just your personal
opinion? Should I contact LWG for an official OSMF position?<br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 15 February 2018 at 09:03, Simon
Poole <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:simon@poole.ch"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">simon@poole.ch</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>AFAIK we've not had any data licensed on ODC-BY 1.0
imported, at least not on a larger scale. <br>
</p>
<p>The ODC-BY licence was supposed to be compatible with
distribution on ODBL terms just as CC BY should be with
CC BY-SA (I would however argue that both do not
actually meet that goal), so most terms are similar to
the ODBL. I do believe that we would at least need a
statement that central attribution as we provide it is
OK with the data source as the ODC-BY terms do not seem
to cater for this.</p>
<p>Simon<br>
</p>
<div>
<div class="h5"> <br>
<div class="m_-5444406050787114423moz-cite-prefix">Am
14.02.2018 um 17:44 schrieb Brian Prangle:<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
<div class="h5">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>
<div>Hi<br>
<br>
</div>
Following my blog <a
href="http://www.mappa-mercia.org/2018/01/the-streets-they-are-changing.html"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">criticising
BT</a> for not releasing data, <a
href="http://www.inlinkuk.com/"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">Inlink
UK</a> have been in touch saying they'd be
only too glad to release their data so we can
use it in OSM. They've asked the following
question which floors me.Can anyone help? I
don't think this one was on the list of
compatible licences on the wiki<br>
<br>
To assist with this are you able to indicate
whether you currently use any data provided
under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0)
or similar licenses providing data attribution
and, if so, how they interact with the
information you release under ODC-ODBL 1.0? <br>
<br>
</div>
Regards<br>
<br>
</div>
Brian<br>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset
class="m_-5444406050787114423mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
</div>
</div>
<pre>______________________________<wbr>_________________
Talk-GB mailing list
<a class="m_-5444406050787114423moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="m_-5444406050787114423moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.openstreetmap.<wbr>org/listinfo/talk-gb</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Talk-GB mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org"
moz-do-not-send="true">Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.openstreetmap.<wbr>org/listinfo/talk-gb</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>