<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
Hi<br>
<br>
I've yet to hear a valid reasoning for this relation type. It's much
more beneficial to add addresses instead.<br>
<br>
There appears an increasing tendency to collect almost anything
together into a relation. See public-transport's 'stop_area' as
another example This is not why relations were conceived. It just
adds duplication, confusion & errors. <br>
<br>
Personally I would delete associatedStreet. <br>
<br>
DaveF <br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 01/06/2019 11:10, Jez Nicholson
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CALBgsigqxPUOOQamzJ-w-B8pJgKwt1quiKZMbveiWDnZEy1P1g@mail.gmail.com">
<pre wrap="">Has anyone else come across relations grouping road assets? i.e. the road
itself plus shops, buildings, street objects? e.g.
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1866997">https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1866997</a> Has this format become
accepted elsewhere in the world or is it experimental?
Regards,
Jez
</pre>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org">Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>