<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Rather than enter text into a value
where a number is expected .. why not use the description tag? <br>
Description=For supervised younger children.<br>
Description=For unsupervised older children.<br>
<br>
??<br>
<br>
On 05/06/19 03:51, SK53 wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAELijW_ttgjQ6mJU4YFYPoH0Z9JUo8qfhVcJ0khWOqXyHty+vg@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>It might be germane to this discussion to consider
minheight & maxheight as possible values. Certainly in ski
resorts it is not uncommon to see minimum heights for certain
chair lifts (typically 1.25m) and I think I've seen similar on
amusement park rides. Height is more likely to be a
determining factor, even if not explicitly signed.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Jerry</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div class="gmail_attr" dir="ltr">On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 at 18:34,
Philip Barnes <<a href="mailto:phil@trigpoint.me.uk"
moz-do-not-send="true">phil@trigpoint.me.uk</a>> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid">On
Tue, 2019-06-04 at 16:49 +0100, Martin Wynne wrote:<br>
> > What about `max_age=toddler`? (i.e. the oldest you
can be is "a <br>
> > toddler"), likewise `min_age=young_child` for the
"older" one? (Is<br>
> > that <br>
> > the best term?) Yes it's not a numeric age, but it's
better than<br>
> > nothing?<br>
> <br>
> Thanks Rory.<br>
> <br>
> I wondered about that. If a tag expects a numeric value,
is it ok to <br>
> enter text?<br>
> <br>
> Or should I invent a new tag, such as maybe
age_range=toddler?<br>
> <br>
> Is "toddler" too UK-specific? Does everyone understand it
to mean<br>
> the <br>
> same thing? Is "infant" younger or older than "toddler"?<br>
> <br>
> For the older children, I wondered about "school-age",
although of <br>
> course there are also infant schools for toddlers.<br>
> <br>
The playgrounds around here have a specific age on the signs,
can't<br>
remember off the top of my head what it is, but it is a lot
older than<br>
toddlers. If it stops raining I will go and have a look at the
local<br>
one. It will be something between 8 and 12.<br>
<br>
The other area has no age limits and it would be wrong for us
to assume<br>
one, each child is different and they will work out for
themselves (or<br>
with parental guidance) when they are ready. There will
certainly be a<br>
huge crossover.<br>
<br>
Phil (trigpoint)<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>