<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<p>My thoughts also.</p>
<p>The description tag is very underused , IMHO. Specialist tags are
undoubtedly extremely useful, they are precise, (should be)
unambiguous and machine-read-friendly, but they do need to gain
traction to be useful and are unfriendly when trying to convey
fuzzy information, as seems to be the case here. And of course
both can be used together when doing something new.<br>
</p>
<p>Mike<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2019-06-05 01:35, Warin wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:00446529-2bc9-233c-11ab-b0ef80d3d05d@gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Rather than enter text into a value
where a number is expected .. why not use the description tag? <br>
Description=For supervised younger children.<br>
Description=For unsupervised older children.<br>
<br>
??<br>
<br>
On 05/06/19 03:51, SK53 wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAELijW_ttgjQ6mJU4YFYPoH0Z9JUo8qfhVcJ0khWOqXyHty+vg@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>It might be germane to this discussion to consider
minheight & maxheight as possible values. Certainly in
ski resorts it is not uncommon to see minimum heights for
certain chair lifts (typically 1.25m) and I think I've seen
similar on amusement park rides. Height is more likely to be
a determining factor, even if not explicitly signed.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Jerry</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div class="gmail_attr" dir="ltr">On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 at 18:34,
Philip Barnes <<a href="mailto:phil@trigpoint.me.uk"
moz-do-not-send="true">phil@trigpoint.me.uk</a>> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid">On
Tue, 2019-06-04 at 16:49 +0100, Martin Wynne wrote:<br>
> > What about `max_age=toddler`? (i.e. the oldest you
can be is "a <br>
> > toddler"), likewise `min_age=young_child` for the
"older" one? (Is<br>
> > that <br>
> > the best term?) Yes it's not a numeric age, but
it's better than<br>
> > nothing?<br>
> <br>
> Thanks Rory.<br>
> <br>
> I wondered about that. If a tag expects a numeric
value, is it ok to <br>
> enter text?<br>
> <br>
> Or should I invent a new tag, such as maybe
age_range=toddler?<br>
> <br>
> Is "toddler" too UK-specific? Does everyone understand
it to mean<br>
> the <br>
> same thing? Is "infant" younger or older than
"toddler"?<br>
> <br>
> For the older children, I wondered about "school-age",
although of <br>
> course there are also infant schools for toddlers.<br>
> <br>
The playgrounds around here have a specific age on the
signs, can't<br>
remember off the top of my head what it is, but it is a lot
older than<br>
toddlers. If it stops raining I will go and have a look at
the local<br>
one. It will be something between 8 and 12.<br>
<br>
The other area has no age limits and it would be wrong for
us to assume<br>
one, each child is different and they will work out for
themselves (or<br>
with parental guidance) when they are ready. There will
certainly be a<br>
huge crossover.<br>
<br>
Phil (trigpoint)<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org">Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>