<html><head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>I will try to avoid adding postcodes in these cases. Basically, narrow down the list of postcodes to add to these that don't have any neighbouring objects with addr: tags.<br><br>Best regards,<br>ndrw6<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 17 July 2019 12:10:32 BST, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoniecz@tutanota.com> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div style="16px" text-align="left">17 Jul 2019, 12:58 by ndrw6@redhazel.co.uk:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div style="16px" text-align="left">I haven't seen such guidelines for the UK myself. In general people prefer having address tags on buildings. Separate address points are more of a stop gap solution until building shapes are sufficiently accurate. <br></div></blockquote><div style="16px" text-align="left">In that case maybe it would be a good idea to merge existing address-only nodes<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">with building outlines as the first step?<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div>
</blockquote></div></body></html>