<div dir="auto">Community input to the plan is important. Any points you would like to discuss can be added to <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Organised_Editing/Activities/National_Trust_Paths">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Organised_Editing/Activities/National_Trust_Paths</a></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, 3 Sep 2019, 07:02 Warin, <<a href="mailto:61sundowner@gmail.com">61sundowner@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
On 3/9/19 8:22 am, David Woolley wrote:<br>
> On 02/09/2019 23:13, Warin wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> On 3/9/19 2:53 am, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:<br>
>>> On 02/09/2019 14:58, David Woolley wrote:<br>
>>>> This could conflict with a trend that I believe is developing, at <br>
>>>> least for more formal roads, of removing signage, because it <br>
>>>> distracts drivers, and relying on satellite navigators to provide <br>
>>>> the information instead.<br>
>>><br>
>>> What evidence have you of this "trend"?<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> I too, would like to hear of evidence of this 'trend'.<br>
>><br>
><br>
> Google "reducing sign clutter" for the general principle.  Use of sat <br>
> nav as an alternative I might have heard on the radio, or in a local <br>
> paper.  However <br>
> <<a href="https://www.driverknowledgetests.com/resources/what-is-signage-clutter-and-how-do-we-reduce-it/" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.driverknowledgetests.com/resources/what-is-signage-clutter-and-how-do-we-reduce-it/</a>> <br>
> is the only reference I can find to that, online, in a quick search. \<br>
<br>
<br>
That is a personal opinion...<br>
<br>
v.s. government link to a 3.1Mb pdf below..<br>
<br>
<a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/reducing-sign-clutter" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/reducing-sign-clutter</a><br>
<br>
><br>
> I think, in practice, it why local councils often don't bother to fix <br>
> AWOL and broken street name signs, even when told about them.<br>
><br>
None of these are for the total removal of signs .. but for the removal <br>
of unnecessary signs.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-GB mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb</a><br>
</blockquote></div>