<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div style="16px" text-align="left">5 Sep 2019, 00:40 by bainton.ete@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div style="16px" text-align="left">Out of interest, is OS's position on derived data clearly the correct one legally speaking? I note the wiki talks in terms of OS 'claiming' IP in the derived data, not that it actually *is* their IP, so I wondered. <br></div></div></blockquote><div style="16px" text-align="left">As far as copyright goes, this seems fairly logical - without having copyright on derived data<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">one would be allowed to trace OSM/Google maps/other copyrighted map, get exact copy and<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">claim that it is free from any copyright/database rights/any legal limitations.<br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left"><br></div><div style="16px" text-align="left">That seems to be an obvious truck-sized loophole that is probably not supposed to exist.<br></div> </body>
</html>