<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 04/11/2019 18:19, Edward Bainton
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAGJTS223ooZssfYN_y2RKLps05ShB+pFqB=zCQS2KvaUDuX3rA@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">(much snippage)<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAGJTS223ooZssfYN_y2RKLps05ShB+pFqB=zCQS2KvaUDuX3rA@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>Sustrans appear to have moved the NCN routes off their own
site altogether (perhaps not news to you), and link directly
to <a href="http://osmaps.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/ncn"
moz-do-not-send="true">osmaps.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/ncn</a>.
The behaviour is pretty horrible - eg, can't cope with more
than one NCN/LCN route on a given stretch of road, which the
OpenCycleMap layer does very nicely. OTOH there's a link to a
route description and to buy the Sustrans paper map. I've no
experience of these.</div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Just to throw in a local anecdote as an aside, as I understand it
Sustrans near Derby changed their mapping to match what was in OSM
because (a) what we had was a better representation of the signage
on the ground and (b) it was a better route for cyclists!</p>
<p>Best Regards,</p>
<p>Andy</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
</body>
</html>