<div dir="ltr">Thanks both<div><br></div><div>@Andy - you're right it certainly doesn't!<div>As the hospital access road (running ENE-WSW) is merely wide with islands rather than formally a dual carriageway, should it be shown as two ways like that?<br></div></div><div><br></div><div><a class="gmail_plusreply" id="plusReplyChip-0" href="mailto:davefoxfac63@btinternet.com" tabindex="-1">@Dave F</a> When you say roundabouts need splitting, will they still get interpreted as roundabouts by routers, ie, inferring the direction without a oneway tag, or do I tag the roundabout segments as one-way in a circle? (or something else!)<br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 00:54, Dave F via Talk-GB <<a href="mailto:talk-gb@openstreetmap.org">talk-gb@openstreetmap.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<br>
<a href="http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=2580522&noCache=true&_noCache=on" target="_blank">http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=2580522&noCache=true&_noCache=on</a><br>
<br>
Click on 'Analysis on map'<br>
<br>
All bits with a marker need looking at, plus roundabouts require
splitting as the bus doesn't go all the way around.<br>
<br>
This one looks like a right mess given the loop with the bus stop is
one way.<br>
<a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2580522#map=19/52.58839/-0.21216" target="_blank">https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2580522#map=19/52.58839/-0.21216</a><br>
<br>
DaveF<br>
<br>
<div>On 05/11/2019 22:51, Edward Bainton
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre>What do I do about a fixme on a relation?
A bus route near me says fixme=check relation plus members - appears broken
<a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2580522#map=14/52.5823/-0.2418&layers=N" target="_blank">https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2580522#map=14/52.5823/-0.2418&layers=N</a>
Presumably 'broken' means the route has gaps in it?
On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 at 21:18, Rob Nickerson <a href="mailto:rob.j.nickerson@gmail.com" target="_blank"><rob.j.nickerson@gmail.com></a>
wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre>So far I have looked at two regions in the UK for fixmes: Warwickshire and
the North West.
In Warwickshire it can be difficult to resolve the fixmes as most (but not
all) require a lot of work. I found a completely different story in the
North West. I found a good number of fixmes there which had already been
resolved and therefore all I had to do was remove the redundant fixme=*
tag. I also found a lot of fixme tags that could be resolved just by using
the latest aerial imagery and/or GPS traces. Once again it has been a
reminder of the differences between places within a few hours of each other.
As for adding new fixme tags, I personally haven't needed to do this yet.
I am curious as to where "peak fixme" lies. If we had 10% more contributors
would we end up with 10% more fixme tags or do you eventually get to a a
point where you turn the corner and start ticking off all these quality
assurance issues?
P.S. The number of Notes is on the up again as well. There are a lot of
good descriptions in the Notes that can be used to update the map. Check
them out at
<a href="http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-notes-country?c=United%20Kingdom" target="_blank">http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-notes-country?c=United%20Kingdom</a>
Best regards,
*Rob*
_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
<a href="mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre></pre>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<br>
<pre>_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
<a href="mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-GB mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb</a><br>
</blockquote></div>