<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>17 Dec 2019, 17:58 by silentspike100@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div>The `building` tag actually specifies the original purpose or form of the building - it just happens that this usually aligns with the current use. As such, I think it's fine to leave them tagged as `building=apartments`.<br></div></div></blockquote><div>I would do exactly this way and add <br></div><div>disused=yes.<br></div><div><br></div><div>IMHO mapping closed convenience shop where just<br></div><div>sign/visible interior remain as<br></div><div>shop=convenience + disused=yes<br></div><div>is a mistake as it is no longer a shop.<br></div><div>disused:shop=convenience would make more sense</div><div><br></div><div>But for example landuse=quarry that is no<br></div><div>longer used but is still <br></div><div>a clearly visible object is still a quarry<br></div><div>so in this case landuse=quarry + disused=yes is preferable<br></div><div><br></div><div>Buildings seems to fit the second case,<br></div><div>building tag describes building construction,<br></div><div>not building use.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Building constructed as a church,<br></div><div>now used as a warehouse but still<br></div><div>clearly constructed as a church is building=church<br></div><div><br></div><div>Church building that is now unused<br></div><div>is building=church<br></div><div><br></div><div>Apartments building that is now unused<br></div><div>is building=church.</div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div><br></div><div>See: <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:use" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:use</a>. Interestingly that wiki page points to the lifecycle prefix page for the case of disused buildings, but I'd say feel free to use `building:use=disused` to explicitly tag them for future mappers to see.<br></div></div><div><br></div><div class=""><div class="" dir="ltr">On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 3:22 PM Jez Nicholson <<a href="mailto:jez.nicholson@gmail.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">jez.nicholson@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class=""><div dir="auto"><div>Change it to building=yes + disused:building=apartments ?...it's still a building, but the original use is now disused?<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">- Jez<br></div></div><div><br></div><div class=""><div class="" dir="ltr">On Tue, 17 Dec 2019, 14:51 Gareth L, <<a target="_blank" href="mailto:o.i@live.co.uk" rel="noopener noreferrer">o.i@live.co.uk</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class=""><div dir="auto"><div>There are some tower blocks near me which have been emptied of residents ahead of eventual demolition of the buildings. They’re not coming back into use due to issues with their construction. <br></div><div><a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/lzDlWfY8iYo2cUVmO1FNmQ/photo">http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/lzDlWfY8iYo2cUVmO1FNmQ/photo</a> They’re boarded up to secure them in the interim.<br></div><div><br></div><div>All the guidance I can find on the abandoned or disused tags are to leave the building as defined but to use abandoned/disused prefix on the amenity. <br></div><div><br></div><div>These didn’t have an amenity though. They do still exist on the ground, but no longer function as apartments.<br></div><div><br></div><div>I’d like to use construction style tagging, but it doesn’t feel quite right looking at all examples I’ve found. e.g.<br></div><div>Building=disused<br></div><div>Disused=apartments<br></div><div><br></div><div>What have you used for buildings which are awaiting demolition, or are undergoing a protracted demolition process but are not amenities?<br></div><div><br></div><div>Gareth<br></div></div><div>_______________________________________________<br></div><div> Talk-GB mailing list<br></div><div> <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org">Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org</a><br></div><div> <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb</a><br></div></blockquote></div><div>_______________________________________________<br></div><div> Talk-GB mailing list<br></div><div> <a target="_blank" href="mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org" rel="noopener noreferrer">Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org</a><br></div><div> <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb</a><br></div></blockquote></div></blockquote> </body>
</html>