<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Aug 18, 2020, 13:18 by steven.hirschorn@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>And what would the conflation exercise be? Are we allowed to put the<br></div><div>points on a non-OSM map to ask local mappers to survey?<br></div></blockquote><div>It would be better to put location on OSM map and ask mappers to<br></div><div>survey there.<br></div><div><br></div><div>As long as they survey and enter data based on what they surveyed<br></div><div>and external source will be used solely to plan trip - AFAIK it should be fine.<br></div><div><br></div><div>With non-OSM map there is risk that some of them will start copying such map.<br></div><div><br></div><div>(there is risk that some of mappers will start copying just marker<br></div><div>positions, without survey, that is why it should be limited to more<br></div><div>experienced mappers and done in way encouraging actual survey<br></div><div>- so no putting such data into Maproulette and so on)<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>Of course I won't begin an import without seeking consensus first -<br></div><div>this was the start of such an attempt!<br></div></blockquote><div>+1<br></div><div><br></div> </body>
</html>