<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>Iff it is not existing then it should be deleted.<br></div><div><br></div><div>It is easy to do it in JOSM (after one <br></div><div>passes hurdle if doing anything in JOSM)<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>1 Sep 2020, 11:52 by jpennycook@bcs.org.uk:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="auto"><div>Hello.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2821036" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2821036</a> and <a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2821037" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2821037</a> (claiming to be National Cycle Network Route 231 and 235) have been listed on OpenStreetMap for some time. They appear to mostly duplicate Regional Cycle Network route 67 (<a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2742" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2742</a>) aka "Round The Island" or "Taste the Wight". 67 is shown on the SusTrans OS Map, but 231 and 235 are not. <br></div><div dir="auto">The only NCN signs I have ever seen on the Isle of Wight are for 22 and 23. I can't find any original sources thst mention either 232 or 235 (they are mentioned in passing in the Wikipedia article on the NCN). I suspect someone worked out a proposed route that was never approved, but it got into OSM anyway. <br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">What should I/we do? E.g.<br></div><div dir="auto">* Mark 231 and 235 as "Proposed"?<br></div><div dir="auto">* Delete both relations? How can this be done easily? <br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Jon <br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div></div></blockquote> </body>
</html>