<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>28 wrz 2020, 13:53 od talk-gb@openstreetmap.org:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>On 28/09/2020 10:00, Frederik Ramm wrote:</div><blockquote><div>The change you plan to execute is of limited use. Yes, it ensures more<br></div><div>conformity in the data, but it will be a temporary fix (since new<br></div><div>"wrong" URLs can be added at any time).<br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Moot. Your claim applies to all tags, all the time. By your logic we might as well not amend anything.<br></div></blockquote><div>Yes, this argument would work as argument<br></div><div>against any type of fix.<br></div><div><br></div><div>fixing case of<br></div><div> highway=mtorway to highway=motorway<br></div><div>would be useful, despite that it may appear<br></div><div>again and it is possible to add automatic fix<br></div><div>for that<br></div><div><br></div><div>(I am not enthusiastic about this pub edit,<br></div><div>as benefit are minimal but if someone<br></div><div>wants to spend time on that I see nothing<br></div><div>wrong with that)<br></div><div><br></div><div>(I am also thinking whatever wiki should <br></div><div>claim that http / https is needed -<br></div><div>in practice it is not really needed or useful)</div> </body>
</html>