<html dir="ltr"><head></head><body style="text-align:left; direction:ltr;"><div>On Sat, 2020-10-03 at 16:50 +0100, Tom Hughes via Talk-GB wrote:</div><blockquote type="cite" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:2px #729fcf solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>On 03/10/2020 14:05, Brian Prangle wrote:</div><div><br></div><blockquote type="cite" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:2px #729fcf solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>There seems to be a predilection for adding turn restrictions , either </div><div>no right rurns or no U turns at the exit flares of roundabouts to </div><div>prevent turning back into the entry flares where there are no explicit </div><div>signed restrictions. I suspect this is "rendering for routers". Do </div><div>routers actually need this data? I'm tempted just to delete them all </div><div>wherever I meet them, but I suspect there are thousands of them and </div><div>there'll be howls of complaint.</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Surely if there is a flare then the entry half of the flare will</div><div>be one-way against anybody turning off which should exclude it from</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Tom</div><div><br></div><div>They are intended to stop this type of routing</div><div><a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=52.64994%2C-1.20491%3B52.64983%2C-1.2049">https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=52.64994%2C-1.20491%3B52.64983%2C-1.2049</a></div><div><br></div><div>Which is techincally not illegal and in real world usage is not going to happen.</div><div><br></div><div>Phil (trigpoint)</div></body></html>