<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>Ok, it seems like this one didn't show up under the right thread. I moved the <a href="mailto:talk-gb@openstreetmap.org">talk-gb@openstreetmap.org</a> to the CC section and emailed <a href="mailto:mark@good-stuff.co.uk">mark@good-stuff.co.uk</a> directly, but it didn't show up under that thread. The way I originally did it is by clicking on the email in the archive, which loads a mailto link, however it only loads <a href="mailto:talk-gb@openstreetmap.org">talk-gb@openstreetmap.org</a> . How do you respond to threads that you haven't been emailed properly?<br></div><div><br></div><div>-- <br></div><div> Sent with Tutanota, the secure & ad-free mailbox: <br></div><div> https://tutanota.com<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>30 Oct 2020, 20:17 by ipswichmapper@tutanota.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>This is why I think that a tasking manager is good. Firstly, it is not exactly "wholesale" in the sense that a lot of data with little checking. Every square is mapped and then validated as well. <br></div><div><br></div><div>Secondly, this is why it is imperative to check if the buildings still exist on Bing. If they do, almost certainly the housenumbers haven't changed. (As mentioned by spiregrain). If the buildings have changed, then you can mark a square as "bad imagery", making the tasking manager even more useful (so that you can discern where the imagery is accurate and where it isn't).<br></div><div><br></div><div>----<br></div><div><br></div><div>Mark wrote:<br></div><div><br></div><div>It's out of copyright, so there aren't any licensing issues in deriving
data from it.
I would, though, be a little reluctant to use it as a basis for
wholesale numbering without any supporting local knowledge or survey.
House numbers can, and sometimes do, change, particularly when streets
are renamed or rebuilt. So you can't be 100% certain that a house number
in the 1950s is the same number it is now, even if the building is still
the same.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Mark <br></div></blockquote><div><br></div> </body>
</html>