<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 31/10/2020 18:19, Jez Nicholson
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CALBgsiiguofzNwuCX3v+5xGrLwUoQ6UUWxxnAfAtKMjrBoJ2fQ@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="auto">
<div>
<div dir="auto">I like it.</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
+ "in the event of dispute... the default language is
English."? .....although I'm not sure how to define dispute'.<br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sat, 31 Oct 2020, 11:07
Ben Proctor, <<a href="mailto:ben@benproctor.co.uk"
moz-do-not-send="true">ben@benproctor.co.uk</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>(snipped)</p>
<p>"In the event of a dispute please discuss among a larger group
and try and find consensus" might be better than being seen to
"hard-code" a preference for one language or another.</p>
<p>With a Data Working Group hat on I've seen language disputes in
various places, and it's often made worse by someone
"overinterpreting" something in a wiki page or elsewhere that was
perfectly well-meaning but not designed to cover the current
situation at all. If you wanted to refer to the DWG directly "in
the event of a dispute" that wouldn't be a problem, since I'd
expect that the first thing that we'd try and do is to get those
involved to talk things through in a wider forum, possibly this
list or something more local if appropriate.</p>
Best Regards,
<p>Andy<br>
</p>
</body>
</html>