<html dir="ltr"><head></head><body style="text-align:left; direction:ltr;"><div>On Fri, 2020-11-13 at 08:36 +0000, Peter Neale via Talk-GB wrote:</div><blockquote type="cite" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:2px #729fcf solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="ydp11d0a0c1yahoo-style-wrap" style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 16px;"><div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">I am pretty sure that I remember checking bridges in my area some time ago, using a tool that someone kindly provided, which flagged up all bridges, where the clearance height was not specified in OSM.</div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false"><br></div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">I regret that I cannot now find the link. </div><div><br></div><div class="ydp11d0a0c1signature"><div style="font-family:new times, serif;font-size:16px;"></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>The isssue with a tool which finds roads under bridges with no maxheight tag is that many are above a legal minimum so have no sign.</div><div><br></div><div>Motorway bridges for example.</div><div><br></div><div>Maybe we need an unsigned tag so that these can be elimiated?</div><div><br></div><div>A hay lorry managed to hit this (unsigned) one a few years ago.</div><div><br></div><div>Phil (trigpoint)</div></body></html>