<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    That's weird. <br>
    Save for some tactile paving what's the difference between North
    & South?<br>
    <br>
    DaveF<br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/12/2020 14:08, Tony Shield wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:c0635eaa-ee7d-e04a-2143-a005111ab0ff@gmail.com">/Are
      there any public cycleways from which pedestrians are actually
      banned?
      <br>
      /
      <br>
      <br>
      Unfortunately yes - <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/827379295">https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/827379295</a>
      <br>
      <br>
      Quite clear signage - Mapillary -
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=53.66933432657343&lng=-2.6290113968031967&z=17&pKey=_ir_HmYAIa4H0rnj1JrO8A&focus=photo">https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=53.66933432657343&lng=-2.6290113968031967&z=17&pKey=_ir_HmYAIa4H0rnj1JrO8A&focus=photo</a><br>
      //
      <br>
      <br>
      When I walk there I take my chances on the illegal walking along a
      cycleway rather than the 50 mph dual carriageway where it is legal
      to walk.
      <br>
      <br>
      <br>
      Tony Shield - TonyS999
      <br>
      <br>
      .
      <br>
      <br>
      On 10/12/2020 12:47, Martin Wynne wrote:
      <br>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <blockquote type="cite">My reasons for changing it, is that it
          is shared use path with a greater number of people of foot
          than bicycle (about 5:2)
          <br>
        </blockquote>
        <br>
        Many public bridleways have many more walkers and cyclists using
        it than actual horse-riders. But are still mapped as bridleways.
        <br>
        <br>
        Map it as a cycleway, unless it is a public bridleway, in which
        case map it as bridleway. You are mapping the status, not the
        actual usage.
        <br>
        <br>
        My feeling is that a highway should be mapped at the highest
        level of permitted usage. The assumption is that pedestrians can
        go almost anywhere anyway. Motorways excepted.
        <br>
        <br>
        Are there any public cycleways from which pedestrians are
        actually banned?
        <br>
        <br>
        cheers,
        <br>
        <br>
        Martin.
        <br>
        <br>
        _______________________________________________
        <br>
        Talk-GB mailing list
        <br>
        <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org">Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org</a>
        <br>
        <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb</a>
        <br>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org">Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>