<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
To realign base imagery with existing OSM data choose something at
ground level, not multi-storey buildings.<br>
<br>
Use major road junctions as they're more likely to be accurately
detailed. Find one with offshoot roads in different directions.
Roundabouts are ideal for this.<br>
<br>
Position tall buildings at the ground position. Don't fall into the
Parallax error trap:<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallax">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallax</a> <br>
<br>
DaveF. <br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 08/01/2021 10:37, Mat Attlee wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CADnaBBQbydrXimcSaSdihc0JqftgGTY0Ro_4M-795zfAxQswcQ@mail.gmail.com">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">At some point I am going to add all the solar panels on top of buildings at
Banister House (<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/546227680">https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/546227680</a>) though in
looking into this I noticed that many of the buildings have different
offsets with the Bing imagery and some of their traces need some tweaking.
When tracing in the panels should I adjust any of this and if so what
approach should I take?
</pre>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org">Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>