<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body dir="auto">
<div dir="ltr">Interesting discussion on this render so far.</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><a href="https://github.com/cyclosm/cyclosm-cartocss-style">https://github.com/cyclosm/cyclosm-cartocss-style</a> Is the project page where bugs/enhancements/pulls can be best reported.</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Gareth</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
<blockquote type="cite">On 18 Jan 2021, at 13:15, Simon Still <simon.still@gmail.com> wrote:<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="">I notice that a new layer has appeared on the OpenStreetMap site in recent weeks - CycleOSM - which gives a more modern look for a cycling map. A lot more detail is visible - eg you can see which side of the road a protected cycleway is situated
on - but still seems to have clarity issues for London (as the distinction between a ‘cycle street’ (which appears to bee any thing tagged as a route) and a 20mph street is a different shade of blue </div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<a href="https://www.cyclosm.org/#map=14/51.4944/-0.1266/cyclosm" class="">https://www.cyclosm.org/#map=14/51.4944/-0.1266/cyclosm</a>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<span>_______________________________________________</span><br>
<span>Talk-GB mailing list</span><br>
<span>Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org</span><br>
<span>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb</span><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>