<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
</head>
<body lang="EN-GB" link="blue" vlink="#954F72" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">I thought for HS2, much of the route was mapped with the =proposed tag ahead of the notice to proceed.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Could that also be an option?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Gareth</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="border:none;padding:0cm"><b>From: </b><a href="mailto:jon.pennycook@gmail.com">Jon Pennycook</a><br>
<b>Sent: </b>30 January 2021 11:53<br>
<b>To: </b><a href="mailto:talk-gb@openstreetmap.org">Talk Gb</a><br>
<b>Subject: </b>Re: [Talk-GB] Significant planning applications</p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">You're right. Unfortunately, I can think of at least three people in my area of interest who map directly from plans leading to non-existent houses, roads, and footways being added (they probably will exist in future, but it makes using
OSM to plan a journey difficult in those areas), or roads that exist being removed from OSM because they didn't appear on a plan. One of the dead giveaways is the sudden appearance of loads of barrier=fence ways, many of which are clearly visible from the
road as either hedges or nothing (ie they've taken the property boundaries from a plan).<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Jon<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Sat, 30 Jan 2021, 11:15 Dave F via Talk-GB, <<a href="mailto:talk-gb@openstreetmap.org">talk-gb@openstreetmap.org</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:4.8pt">Personally I don't waste my time with proposed developments, especially
<br>
roads, as they're often rejected or take decades to come to fruition. <br>
The 'as built' rarely corresponds with the application. I wait until <br>
turf has been cut before adding data to OSM.<br>
<br>
As has been suggested, something like uMap is your best bet.<br>
<br>
DaveF<br>
<br>
On 29/01/2021 17:59, Martin Wynne wrote:<br>
> What if any, is the guidance on mapping the location of a significant <br>
> planning application?<br>
><br>
> There is an application locally to build several hundred houses on <br>
> what is currently mapped as farmland.<br>
><br>
> I have been asked if there is an online map available which shows the <br>
> location. At first sight OSM seems the obvious answer, but there is <br>
> absolutely nothing on the ground to be mapped to show the existence of <br>
> the planning application (apart from a few A4 paper notices on <br>
> fenceposts - hardly mappable).<br>
><br>
> What if anything can I add and then provide a link to on the standard <br>
> OSM map? A boundary relation? Tagged as what?<br>
><br>
> Of course, there are the application maps on the local planning <br>
> authority's web site, but they are difficult to access for the general <br>
> public - require a file download, they don't have North at the top, <br>
> and they don't show the surrounding countryside.<br>
><br>
> Thanks.<br>
><br>
> Martin.<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Talk-GB mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb</a><br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-GB mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb</a><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>