<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Aug 5, 2021, 14:04 by ajt1047@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>In GB, following a bit of to and fro, the most common way of expressing "something used by the highway authority but unsigned and not used by anyone else except perhaps people at https://www.sabre-roads.org.uk/" is "highway_authority_ref":<br></div><div><br></div><div>http://taginfo.geofabrik.de/europe/great-britain/search?q=ref<br></div><div><br></div><div>For completeness, I consume this tag (and many other alternatives) for map.atownsend.org.uk, and names and refs that probably aren't signed appear in brackets.<br></div></blockquote><div dir="auto">Would it be correct to describe it as covering the same as unsigned_ref<br></div><div dir="auto">"Indicates a route number that has assigned ref that is not prominently signposted with<br></div><div dir="auto">a reassurance marker."<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:unsigned_ref#Usage">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:unsigned_ref</a><br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">but with less confusing name for cases where road authority signed this unused code?<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">I want to create wiki page for it as it seems a better named tag for the same<br></div><div dir="auto">case as unsigned_ref.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div> </body>
</html>