<div dir="auto"><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sun, 29 Aug 2021, 13:02 ael via Talk-GB, <<a href="mailto:talk-gb@openstreetmap.org">talk-gb@openstreetmap.org</a>> wrote:</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Any suggestions for tagging? I think that we need something new.<br></blockquote></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Have you seen the page Mike Collinson started? <a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Historic_mining_activity_in_the_United_Kingdom">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Historic_mining_activity_in_the_United_Kingdom</a></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Would a lifecycle tag help by leaving landuse and natural open, e.g.</div><div dir="auto">abandoned:landuse=industrial</div><div dir="auto">abandoned:industrial=mine</div><div dir="auto"><span style="font-family:sans-serif">abandoned:mine=streamwork</span><br></div><div dir="auto"><font face="sans-serif">(or ruins:) perhaps?</font> <span style="font-family:sans-serif">I can see industrial might grate a little for the prehistoric.</span></div><div dir="auto"><font face="sans-serif">And/or potentially </font></div><div dir="auto"><font face="sans-serif">historic=archaeological_site</font></div><div dir="auto"><font face="sans-serif">site_type=mineral_extraction</font></div><div dir="auto"><font face="sans-serif"><br></font></div><div dir="auto"><font face="sans-serif">Hope that helps</font></div><div dir="auto"><font face="sans-serif">Tom</font></div><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
</blockquote></div></div></div>