<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
Looking at GSV the symbols on the path are only bicycles & are
one way. The footpath is presumably two way. In some sections the
cycleway becomes on-road/white painted lines. I'm pretty sure the
authority's intent is for those sections to be cycle only.<br>
<br>
DaveF<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 07/09/2021 17:39, SK53 wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAELijW_sdM_P3E=K_=3uAe7hi5jjTDqo=+PWok7emSUhVJQ=Lw@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">As I understand it a formal legal restriction
preventing pedestrians from using a public highway is very
unusual (I've only mapped one that I can recall), and there are
no legal restrictions as to pedestrians ambling along cycleways,
however annoying that may be to cyclists. I therefore think a
tag foot=no, as several commenters have suggested, is therefore
incorrect.<br>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, 7 Sept 2021 at 17:13,
Dave F via Talk-GB <<a
href="mailto:talk-gb@openstreetmap.org"
moz-do-not-send="true">talk-gb@openstreetmap.org</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div> I'd consider this as tagged incorrectly in OSM.<br>
<br>
cycleway:surface is for where an individual path is
segregated & has different surfaces for pedestrians
& bike riders.<br>
<br>
This way is solely for cyclists so should have:<br>
foot=no<br>
surface=* <br>
segregated should be removed.<br>
<br>
<br>
Likewise the footway should have:<br>
bicycle=no.<br>
<br>
DaveF<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<div>On 07/09/2021 14:26, Mat Attlee wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>I've noticed that StreetComplete is asking for the
the footpath surface on this dedicated cycleway <a
href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/605733634"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/605733634</a></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>There is a separate footpath way so is this a bug
in StreetComplete or are some tags missing on the
cycleway?<br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<pre>_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
<a href="mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-GB mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>