<div dir="auto"><div><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sun, 2 Jan 2022, 20:20 Gregory Williams, <<a href="mailto:gregory@gregorywilliams.me.uk">gregory@gregorywilliams.me.uk</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I think that a number of the tourism=village_sign ones in Kent will<br>
have been added by me over the years. As Jerry mentions, these are the<br>
decorative kind, such as:<br>
<br>
<a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/gregorywilliams/albums/72157608682306727" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.flickr.com/photos/gregorywilliams/albums/72157608682306727</a></blockquote></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Thanks. Would anyone object to using tourism=village_sign when they refer to a small town/suburb?</div><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
</blockquote></div></div></div>