<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>Hi Chris</p>
<p>Could highway=footway be better than highway=path in this
instance</p>
<p>Tony<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 19/04/2022 13:52, Chris Hodges
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:a625672c-830f-1322-c27f-61d654b03a23@c-hodges.co.uk">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<p>I agree completely, and Heavy Metal Handcyclist was one of the
accessibility advocates I was thinking of, along with riders
whose bikes give them mobility while being harder to recognise
as mobility aids (e.g. <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://twitter.com/tricyclemayor"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://twitter.com/tricyclemayor</a>
). Then there's the gentleman who parked his e-bike outside
Lidl, unfolded his walking stick, and went off to do his
shopping as I was loading my bike - he wouldn't be doing much
pushing.</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>I'm an able-bodied bike tourist so my difficulties are mere
irritations compared to the trouble some people have (pretty big
irritations when I have to lift it over a gate because the gap
it's supposed to be pushed through is too tiny and it weighs
40kg laden - but irritations nonetheless)<br>
</p>
<p>BTW I'm wary of deleting anything myself, let alone deleting to
replace with another way of recording.</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>I had routing issues on Sunday where Komoot had used OSM data
to route us up something labelled "public footpath" and not
loking much like it was designed to be ridden (<a
class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119859473"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119859473</a>
is my attempt to fix). I think<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 19/04/2022 13:00, Jon Pennycook
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAO56uom-ABqi5jpkuYsx3O8+Bz7e-k7OrJhcdGk_9_79eZ_rSQ@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="auto">Hello Chris.
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">This is one reason why I disagree with people
who delete cycleways and replace with a generic
cycleway=track on the road. The data on dropped kerbs,
inaccessible barriers, and dismount sections are lost. The
late Heavy Metal Handcyclist <a
href="https://twitter.com/CrippledCyclist"
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://twitter.com/CrippledCyclist</a>
used to post on Twitter on how they would get councils to
remove such barriers (their cycle was their mobility aid). </div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">From my point of view, having my pannier bags
full of shopping or stuff for my holiday means I can't just
dismount and push my bike over a raised kerb, and getting
round narrow gaps in barriers is impossible. Similarly,
people tagging non-cyclable ways as bicycle=yes makes
journey planning problematic.</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">Jon</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, 19 Apr 2022, 12:51
Chris Hodges, <<a href="mailto:chris@c-hodges.co.uk"
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">chris@c-hodges.co.uk</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<p>The editor in this case is clearly wrong, and this is
why we have the "dismount" tag, which renderers are free
to use/stuff up as they see fit.</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>But the main problem here isn't really the user. It's
the planners who designate cycle routes that can't be
cycled. Not all cyclists can dismount and push.
Reading up on accessible cycling recently has been
eye-opening<br>
</p>
<div>On 19/04/2022 11:12, Jon Pennycook via Talk-GB wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="auto">
<div>> But I have noticed that a small number of
people on OSM don't seem to like cycle infra (or
maybe they don't understand it).</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">And some people like to put
bicycle=yes on things that are convenient for them
to cycle on, even when they are clearly private or
have Cyclists Dismount signs. </div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">For example, footways with Cyclists
Dismount signs, formerly tagged bicycle=dismount,
and members of two LCNs and an NCN:-</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">> <span>Hi the signs are present,
but it is a route for cyclists, by customising the
drop down you exclude the section from 3rd party
systems that use the data. Hence changed to Yes
for cycles, as it is regardless of whether ridden
or pushed.</span><br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote" dir="auto">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, 18 Apr
2022, 07:28 Jon Pennycook, <<a
href="mailto:jpennycook@bcs.org.uk"
target="_blank" rel="noreferrer"
moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">jpennycook@bcs.org.uk</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0
0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc
solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">Morning.
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I think those are two different people -
Nathan_A_RF now tends to specialise in edits
around Southampton (I think they used some
controversial sources for a wider area until
last Autumn, according to their Block page),
and AR_Mapper specialises in Bracknell and
New York.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>But I have noticed that a small number of
people on OSM don't seem to like cycle infra
(or maybe they don't understand it).</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Jon</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, 18
Apr 2022 at 05:41, Robert Skedgell <<a
href="mailto:rob@hubris.org.uk"
rel="noreferrer noreferrer"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">rob@hubris.org.uk</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">The same
user added an entirely spurious bicycle=no
to a bus gate in <br>
Woodham Ferrers. This made cycle routers
take the scenic route and <br>
turned 300m of shared footway along Ferrers
Road into a dead end. There <br>
was no source for the "corrections" in this
edit. How odd that cycle <br>
infra seems to be the common feature in
their problematic edits...<br>
<br>
<a
href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93778124"
rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93778124</a><br>
<br>
On 17/04/2022 18:51, Jon Pennycook via
Talk-GB wrote:<br>
> Thanks Phil - that's very helpful.<br>
> <br>
> I don't understand what caused them to
do this. It turns out they are <br>
> not new - they just have a low edit
count and that I've spoken to them <br>
> before about cycleways in Bracknell:-<br>
> <a
href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92601276"
rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92601276</a>
<br>
> <<a
href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92601276"
rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92601276</a>><br>
> <br>
> Jon<br>
> <br>
> On Sun, 17 Apr 2022 at 18:47, Philip
Barnes <<a
href="mailto:phil@trigpoint.me.uk"
rel="noreferrer noreferrer"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">phil@trigpoint.me.uk</a>
<br>
> <mailto:<a
href="mailto:phil@trigpoint.me.uk"
rel="noreferrer noreferrer"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">phil@trigpoint.me.uk</a>>>
wrote:<br>
> <br>
> I believe I have reverted<br>
> it, <a
href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119825773"
rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119825773</a><br>
> <<a
href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119825773"
rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119825773</a>><br>
> <br>
> Phil (trigpoint)<br>
> <br>
> On Sun, 2022-04-17 at 18:10 +0100,
Jon Pennycook via Talk-GB wrote:<br>
> > Hello.<br>
> ><br>
> > A relatively new mapper just
deleted a whole load of cycleways in<br>
> > Bracknell that were correctly
mapped in<br>
> > <a
href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119816211"
rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119816211</a><br>
> <<a
href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119816211"
rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119816211</a>><br>
> > I wasn't able to use <a
href="http://revert.osmz.ru/"
rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">http://revert.osmz.ru/</a><br>
> <<a
href="http://revert.osmz.ru/"
rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">http://revert.osmz.ru/</a>>
to revert the change:-<br>
> > Status: too big<br>
> > Error: Would not revert 644
changes<br>
> ><br>
> > Could someone assist with the
reversion, please? Or should I contact<br>
> > the DWG for assistance?<br>
> ><br>
> > Jon Pennycook<br>
> >
_______________________________________________<br>
> > Talk-GB mailing list<br>
> > <a
href="mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org"
rel="noreferrer noreferrer"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org</a>
<mailto:<a
href="mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org"
rel="noreferrer noreferrer"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org</a>><br>
> > <a
href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb"
rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb</a><br>
> <<a
href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb"
rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb</a>><br>
> <br>
> <br>
>
_______________________________________________<br>
> Talk-GB mailing list<br>
> <a
href="mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org"
rel="noreferrer noreferrer"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org</a>
<mailto:<a
href="mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org"
rel="noreferrer noreferrer"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org</a>><br>
> <a
href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb"
rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb</a><br>
> <<a
href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb"
rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb</a>><br>
> <br>
> <br>
>
_______________________________________________<br>
> Talk-GB mailing list<br>
> <a
href="mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org"
rel="noreferrer noreferrer"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
> <a
href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb"
rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb</a><br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-GB mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org"
rel="noreferrer noreferrer"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a
href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb"
rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset>
<pre>_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
<a href="mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Talk-GB mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org">Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>