<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div>4 lip 2022, 23:08 od ajt1047@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><p>Frankly, I'm struggling to find a way to reply to that suggestion
in a way that wouldn't (rightly) get me reprimanded by the list
moderators. <br></p></blockquote><div dir="auto">I would support full revert. For me large scale import, done without addressing feedback<br></div><div dir="auto">raised by mappers is sufficient reason in itself.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Not doing this just encourages "lets import stuff and maybe it will stay even if we<br></div><div dir="auto">violated rules"<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Also, local mappers reported that they import outdated data, destroying what was correctly<br></div><div dir="auto">mapped.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Maybe at least part of data can be usefully imported later?<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Disclaimer: I am not a local mapper<br></div> </body>
</html>