<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    Please don't make amendments while discussion is ongoing. it just
    confuses the matter further.<br>
    <br>
    DaveF<br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 09/01/2023 19:13, Paul Berry wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAOQ3VgntQ9Dc6XaxTtqDujv5owhm=GhM_F51fDa2_yhp9Qg1vQ@mail.gmail.com">
      <div dir="ltr">I've now fixed this as of changeset 131072017.
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Regards,<br>
          <i>Paul</i></div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <div class="gmail_quote">
        <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 at 14:01,
          Paul Berry <<a href="mailto:pmberry2007@gmail.com"
            moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">pmberry2007@gmail.com</a>>
          wrote:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote class="gmail_quote">
          <div dir="ltr">
            <div>Hi Ed,</div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>Interesting example. Ordsall is within East Retford
              which is unparished (see <a
                href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6446737"
                target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
                class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6446737</a>).
              It shouldn't be a level 10 boundary and, as you point out,
              should be reduced to a residential area instead.</div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>Regards,</div>
            <div><i>Paul</i></div>
          </div>
          <br>
          <div class="gmail_quote">
            <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 at
              13:33, Ed Loach <<a href="mailto:edloach@gmail.com"
                target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
                class="moz-txt-link-freetext">edloach@gmail.com</a>>
              wrote:<br>
            </div>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote">Dave F asked:<br>
              <br>
              > Are there valid reasons for including
              place=village|town|city tags in boundary=administrative
              relations?<br>
              > admin_level=10<br>
              > <br>
              > <a href="https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1pUf"
                rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
                class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1pUf</a><br>
              <br>
              The first one I picked at random was<br>
              <a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13687551"
                rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
                class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13687551</a><br>
              It looks to be more likely this is a random boundary to a
              residential area rather than a parish boundary and
              probably shouldn't have boundary tags on at all. I think
              what I'm saying is they'll need checking on a case by case
              basis.<br>
              <br>
              Ed<br>
              <br>
              <br>
              _______________________________________________<br>
              Talk-GB mailing list<br>
              <a href="mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank"
                moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
              <a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb"
                rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
                class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb</a><br>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>