<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto">The section that’s closed is <a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/166615742">https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/166615742</a><div><br></div><div>The rest of the road is open for access to the various dwellings and businesses to the west and east of the closure. </div><div><br></div><div>The closed section is still intact but showing signs of movement - and any reopening is likely to be after the road is diverted.</div><div><br></div><div>Regards </div><div><br></div><div>Fiona</div><div><br><div dir="ltr">Sent from my iPad</div><div dir="ltr"><br><blockquote type="cite">On 28 Feb 2023, at 16:06, Edward Catmur via Talk-GB <talk-gb@openstreetmap.org> wrote:<br><br></blockquote></div><blockquote type="cite"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 at 09:10, Andy Townsend <<a href="mailto:ajt1047@gmail.com">ajt1047@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"> > is this still actually a road? Should it retain its<br>
highway=secondary designation at all?<br>
<br>
I'd have thought that "disused:highway=secondary" was appropriate here <br>
until it actually falls into the sea. It's not like the Mam Tor road <br>
where it is in some sense usable, just not for motor traffic.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Is the roadway still intact, or would "destroyed:highway=secondary" be more appropriate? (Could you send a self-driving car along it?)</div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Best Regards,<br>
<br>
Andy<br>
<br>
<br>
On 28/02/2023 14:06, Andy Allan wrote:<br>
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 at 12:59, ael via Talk-GB <<a href="mailto:talk-gb@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">talk-gb@openstreetmap.org</a>> wrote:<br>
>> I just noticed this news item:<br>
>> <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-somerset-64784413" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-somerset-64784413</a><br>
>><br>
>> Presumably this is<br>
>> <a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/166615739#map=16/51.1795/-3.3458" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/166615739#map=16/51.1795/-3.3458</a><br>
>><br>
>> It presumably needs a new access tag at least? I suspect that we<br>
>> don't have any local mappers in the area.<br>
> Here's the section with the access tags:<br>
><br>
> <a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/166615742" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/166615742</a><br>
><br>
> However, given the contents of the news report - including phrases<br>
> like "The situation with land movement in this part of the cliff is<br>
> terminal; eventually the road is going to disappear into the sea" and<br>
> the DfT intervening with sufficient funds being "highly unlikely to<br>
> materialise" - is this still actually a road? Should it retain its<br>
> highway=secondary designation at all? At what point is this road no<br>
> longer a road?<br>
><br>
> Thanks,<br>
> Andy<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Talk-GB mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-GB mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb</a><br>
</blockquote></div></div>
<span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>Talk-GB mailing list</span><br><span>Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org</span><br><span>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb</span><br></div></blockquote></div></body></html>