<div dir="ltr"><div>In that case Kent & East Sussex Railway probably doesn't count as public transport as it only seems to offer day tickets (<a href="https://kesr.org.uk/">https://kesr.org.uk/</a>), I do wonder if that would change when they finally get re-connected to the main line to the west.</div><div><br></div><div>cheers,</div><div>Martin.<br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 at 16:22, Peter Neale via Talk-GB <<a href="mailto:talk-gb@openstreetmap.org">talk-gb@openstreetmap.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div><div style="font-family:times new roman,new york,times,serif;font-size:16px"><div><div dir="ltr">The Dartmouth Steam Railway, whilst a heritage rail line, also has a regular timetable and sells single and return tickets, so is not reserved to tourists.<br><br>Indeed, they now have an agreement with Great Western Rail (GWR) to offer through ticketing from stations on the main rail network to Dartmouth.</div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr">So, my vote is for the Dartmouth Steam Railway to be classified as "public transport". It is currently tagged as " <span>railway:preserved=yes", which is also true. Do "preserved/heritage" and "public transport" have to be mutually exclusive?</span> (Sorry; I am new to this topic - how would it be tagged to make it "public transport"; does it just have to lose the "heritage" tag?)</div><div><br></div><div><div style="font-family:new times,serif;font-size:16px"><div>Regards,</div><div dir="ltr">Peter</div><div dir="ltr"><br></div>(PeterPan99)<br></div></div></div>
<div><br></div><div><br></div>
</div><div id="m_-8939687733346914147ydp1a858986yahoo_quoted_8704978497">
<div style="font-family:"Helvetica Neue",Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:rgb(38,40,42)">
<div>
On Monday, 19 February 2024 at 15:44:21 GMT, Paul Berry <<a href="mailto:pmberry2007@gmail.com" target="_blank">pmberry2007@gmail.com</a>> wrote:
</div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<div><div id="m_-8939687733346914147ydp1a858986yiv3579761119"><div><div dir="ltr">I think the Romney, Hythe & Dymchurch Railway can make a serious claim to be a regular passenger private railway, run as a public service, even if it relies heavily on tourism. I'm sure there are others.<div><br clear="none"></div><div>Regards,<br clear="none"><i>Paul</i></div></div><br clear="none"><div id="m_-8939687733346914147ydp1a858986yiv3579761119yqt56034"><div><div dir="ltr">On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 at 15:06, Dave F via Talk-GB <<a shape="rect" href="mailto:talk-gb@openstreetmap.org" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">talk-gb@openstreetmap.org</a>> wrote:<br clear="none"></div><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Hi<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
Tourist railway stations are not public transport.<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
Due to the iD editor, many railway=station entities tagged with either <br clear="none">
usage-tourism and/or tourism=* have public_transport tags added by <br clear="none">
default or recommendation.<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
<a shape="rect" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_transport" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_transport</a><br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
I believe this to be incorrect tagging, but before I remove them & log <br clear="none">
it as an iD editor issue on Github, I thought I'd check to see if it's <br clear="none">
known if there are any tourist railway companies running a year round, <br clear="none">
timetabled schedule that's regulated in a similar way to those running <br clear="none">
as part of National Rail.<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
DaveF<br clear="none">
<br clear="none">
_______________________________________________<br clear="none">
Talk-GB mailing list<br clear="none">
<a shape="rect" href="mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org</a><br clear="none">
<a shape="rect" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb</a><br clear="none">
</blockquote></div></div>
</div></div><div id="m_-8939687733346914147ydp1a858986yqt31717">_______________________________________________<br clear="none">Talk-GB mailing list<br clear="none"><a shape="rect" href="mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org</a><br clear="none"><a shape="rect" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb</a><br clear="none"></div></div>
</div>
</div></div>_______________________________________________<br>
Talk-GB mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb</a><br>
</blockquote></div>