<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">2012/11/10 Mario Pichetti <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mario.pichetti@gmail.com" target="_blank">mario.pichetti@gmail.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
link <a href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dreservoir" target="_blank">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/<u></u>wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dreservoir</a><br>
<br>
Status<br>
<br>
Some mappers consider the landuse=reservoir tag "deprecated" and prefer the natural=water + water=reservoir scheme. This new scheme was introduced by water details proposal but is currently rarely used (3400 uses as of 06 December 2011) whereas there are close to 200000 uses of landuse=reservoir so it's not likely to go away any time soon.<br>
<br>
natural or landuse ?<br>
<br></blockquote>Io userei la proposta approvata, prima o poi si dovranno migrare i tag vecchi...<div>Gli editor quale supportano?</div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
Ciao Mario.<br>
<br class=""></blockquote><div>Ciao, </div><div>Stefano </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
Talk-it mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Talk-it@openstreetmap.org" target="_blank">Talk-it@openstreetmap.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it" target="_blank">http://lists.openstreetmap.<u></u>org/listinfo/talk-it</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>