<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Grazie Volker! Ho informato Markuss
      della richiesta di riorganizzazione. È stata scelta la comunità
      italiana perchè le altre (Inglese, Tedesca, Francese) sono troppo
      grandi per una recensione iniziale (troppi commenti da gestire
      contemporaneamene nella prima fase) e perchè aveva avuto modo di
      parlare con me all'epoca della traduzione della pagina wiki di
      Keypad Mapper 3, quindi ero uno dei possibili contatti con la
      comunità italiana.<br>
      <br>
      Leonardo<br>
      <br>
      Il 07/02/2014 12:44, Volker Schmidt ha scritto:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CALQ-OR64rPsnPvHExQmGWO0VfH6ExF8f9LKzgUDmoY_Aee_7Mw@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">Leonardo,<br>
        <br>
        <div>
          <div class="gmail_extra">
            <div class="gmail_quote">
              <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
                0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
                rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
                <div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
                  <div> per favore non fermarti con i commenti, anche se
                    sono tanti. Se preferisci, fai un commento generale
                    sulla qualità, indicando i casi eclatanti di icone
                    che non sono chiare.<br>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </blockquote>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>Il commento generale l'ho già fatto. <br>
              </div>
              <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
                0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
                rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
                <div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
                  <div> <br>
                    Il feedback iniziale della comunità italiana è stato
                    scelto solo perché Markuss sta ancora ottimizzando
                    la procedura di review e si voleva iniziare
                    semplicemente da una wiki. Sarebbe controproducente
                    mostrare questo lavoro se la struttura necessaria
                    per commentarla fosse troppo "traballante". <br>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </blockquote>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>Anche se non ho capito perché si procede con questo
                prima in Italia, ...<br>
                <br>
              </div>
              <div>Prima cosa che propongo, è di riorganizzare la lista
                in tal modo che icone della stessa categoria siano
                raggruppati  (mi sono trovato di commentare su un
                pittogramma, e poi ho trovato lo stesso pittogramma
                utilizzato per un altro tipo di POI della stessa
                categoria più avanti. Mi sembra di capire che la
                numerazione dei pittogrammi è sistematica e gerarchica.
                Allora, prima di tutto mettete la lista in rete in
                ordine di questi numeri. <br>
              </div>
              <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
                0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
                rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
                <div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
                  <div> <br>
                    È naturale che il lavoro sarà esposto al commento
                    internazionale, altrimenti come potrebbe essere
                    anche solo preso in  considerazione per il sito <a
                      moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://osm.org"
                      target="_blank">osm.org</a>?<br>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </blockquote>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>Meno male, ma quest'affermazione sul sito sembravo
                molto strano. <br>
              </div>
              <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
                0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
                rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
                <div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
                  <div> <br>
                    Aspettiamo i tuoi commenti!<br>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </blockquote>
              <div><br>
              </div>
              <div>Ecco i primi 20%:<br>
                <br>
                =====================================<br>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">19001: If
                  23001 is used
                  for an military airfield the symbol 19001 should only
                  be used for
                  civil airport (see 11001)</p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">The symbol for
                  an historic
                  aircraft needs to be different, maybe a biplane symbol
                  could do the
                  trick</p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB"><br>
                </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">23002:
                  impossible to
                  understand</p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB"><br>
                </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">25002:
                  difficult to
                  recognise</p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB"><br>
                </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">34001: put a
                  ship in the
                  bathtub, otherwise impossible to recognise</p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB"><br>
                </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">25003:
                  impossible to
                  understand</p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB"><br>
                </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">16003: change
                  the form of
                  the hive </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB"><br>
                </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">27003: why not
                  use the
                  "railway crossing" European road sign (see 27007)</p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB"><br>
                </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">35000: looks
                  like a camp
                  site for homosexuals :-)</p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB"><br>
                </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">23003:
                  impossible to
                  understand</p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB"><br>
                </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">32003: replace
                  the man by
                  a bus (as in 32001)</p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB"><br>
                </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">16005:
                  misleading, use
                  34003 instead</p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB"><br>
                </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">29007:
                  misleading - I only
                  see wine bottles in the pictogram</p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB"><br>
                </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">21002: looks
                  like an
                  emergency exit</p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB"><br>
                </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">27005:
                  difficult to
                  recognise</p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB"><br>
                </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">29010: looks
                  like the sign
                  of a calligrapher. This is not a pictogram. Put some
                  clothes on it,
                  but not a letter </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB"><br>
                </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">21004: repair
                  the
                  binoculars (connect the two parts)</p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB"><br>
                </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">29025:
                  difficult to
                  recognise</p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB"><br>
                </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">26001:
                  impossible to
                  understand. Needs to have the electricity symbol added</p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB"><br>
                </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">22003: looks
                  like an eye.
                  Why not use a light-tower symbol?</p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB"><br>
                </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">22006: the tag
                  man_made=campanile
                  documented in the wiki but is used only 130 times. It
                  looks that the tag is wrong as it refers to the
                  Swedish Klockstapel which is completely different from
                  a "campanile". The normal tagging for a campanile is
                  man_made=tower + tower:type= bell_tower
                  should be covered by the same pictogram. (it's
                  "official" and used more then 5000 times). The
                  pictogram is misleading,
                  as a campanile is much higher than the bell-frame
                  shown in the
                  pictogram (see <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_tower"
                    target="_blank">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell_tower</a>;
                  <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campanile"
                    target="_blank">https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campanile</a>)</p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">(I will raise
                  this point in the Tagging mailing list)<br>
                </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB"><br>
                </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">13004:
                  impossible to
                  understand. Why not use the "customs" road sign
                  (<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:BSicon_GRENZE_legende.svg"
                    target="_blank">https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:BSicon_GRENZE_legende.svg</a>)</p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB"><br>
                </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">24003:
                  misleading; I see a
                  mountain, but not a glacier here</p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB"><br>
                </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">22008:
                  misleading; this is
                  a cooling tower, not a chimney</p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB"><br>
                </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">13006:
                  impossible to
                  understand</p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB"><br>
                </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">35001:
                  misleading; looks
                  like a camp site with a bar (strange antenna)</p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB"><br>
                </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">19005:
                  misleading; looks
                  like a historic British phone box. Unrecognisable as a
                  historic
                  building</p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB"><br>
                </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">26004: missing
                  electricity
                  symbol. Unrecognisable without that.</p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB"><br>
                </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">19006: use a
                  side view
                  instead (<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="http://4vector.com/free-vector/cannon-clip-art-110239"
                    target="_blank">http://4vector.com/free-vector/cannon-clip-art-110239</a>)</p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB"><br>
                </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">19008:
                  misleading;
                  historic=church is a former church, no longer in use.
                  The pictogram
                  does not imply this.</p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB"><br>
                </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">19010:
                  historic=farm is a
                  former farm, no longer in use. The pictogram does not
                  imply this.
                  Anyway, even for a working farm, it is not very clear</p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB"><br>
                </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">19020:
                  misleading;looks
                  like a city wall tower, not like a fort</p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB"><br>
                </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">13007:
                  misleading; looks
                  like a zebra crossing (seen from the pedestrian point
                  of view)</p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB"><br>
                </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">13008:
                  difficult to
                  understand without something where the chani is fixed
                  to</p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB"><br>
                </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">13010:
                  misleading; looks
                  like a road bump</p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB"><br>
                </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">26005: this is
                  a cooling
                  tower, not a power generator (which could be also a
                  wind power
                  generator</p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB"><br>
                </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">26008: why
                  does this one
                  not have a cooling tower?</p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB"><br>
                </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">Generally for
                  power
                  generators: I would add the output type of power, i.e.
                  in most cases
                  electricity</p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB"><br>
                </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">26021: why not
                  use the
                  cooling tower symbol as for the biogas generator</p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB"><br>
                </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">22009:
                  clear-cut shut not
                  be mapped anyway, as it does not last. The pictogram
                  does not show a
                  clear-cut, but suggests dead trees</p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB"><br>
                </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">25007:
                  misleading. For me
                  this is a money lender or a lawyer</p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB"><br>
                </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">18007:
                  misleading. There
                  should <u>not</u> be a separate symbol for mini-
                  (i.e. traversable)
                  and "normal" (i.e. non traversable) roundabouts.</p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB"><br>
                </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">27023:
                  difficult to
                  understand</p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB"><br>
                </p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">24007: in
                  principle
                  useful, but corresponds to an abandoned tag proposal
                  (<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Trees"
                    target="_blank">http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Trees</a>)
                  even though it's in use</p>
                <p style="margin-bottom:0cm" lang="en-GB">==================================================<br>
                </p>
                 
                <br>
              </div>
              <div>Volker<br>
              </div>
              <div>
                <div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
                  <div><br>
                    <br>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
            <br>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Talk-it mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Talk-it@openstreetmap.org">Talk-it@openstreetmap.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it">https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>