<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div><br><br><br>Anfang der weitergeleiteten E‑Mail:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><b>Von:</b> Paul Norman <<a href="mailto:penorman@mac.com">penorman@mac.com</a>><br><b>Datum:</b> 22 febbraio 2014 04:16:32 CET<br><b>An:</b> Mike Linksvayer <<a href="mailto:ml@gondwanaland.com">ml@gondwanaland.com</a>><br><b>Kopie:</b> Talk-CA OpenStreetMap <<a href="mailto:talk-ca@openstreetmap.org">talk-ca@openstreetmap.org</a>>, "<a href="mailto:legal@osmfoundation.org">legal@osmfoundation.org</a>" <<a href="mailto:legal@osmfoundation.org">legal@osmfoundation.org</a>>, "Licensing and other legal discussions." <<a href="mailto:legal-talk@openstreetmap.org">legal-talk@openstreetmap.org</a>><br><b>Betreff:</b> <b>Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [Talk-ca] Nouvelle licence de données ouvertes au Québec</b><br><b>Antwort an:</b> "Licensing and other legal discussions." <<a href="mailto:legal-talk@openstreetmap.org">legal-talk@openstreetmap.org</a>><br><br></div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div>CC BY 3.0 and earlier had onerous attribution requirements for data. I believe 4.0 fixes this. I don't think anyone has suggested contacting a data provider who's licensed under CC 4.0 licenses to clarify attribution.</div><div><br></div><div>The issue with 3.0 attribution are not purely theoretical, there have been providers who have objected to how we have attribution and we've been unable to use their data.</div></blockquote></body></html>