<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
On 3/8/2017 11:44 AM, Paul Norman wrote:<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:67eba3ab-2bdb-29e4-1cc8-3010eea0dd41@mac.com"
type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2/26/2017 5:10 PM, Paul Norman
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:dcb9d54d-aba9-03aa-3a95-0179e2f79f02@mac.com"
type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
On 2/25/2017 2:47 AM, Paul Norman wrote:<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:748f43e6-30fe-a461-47c9-65be469fe12c@mac.com"
type="cite">On 2/23/2017 12:00 PM, Simon Poole wrote: <br>
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">while not
speaking for the DWG, I suspect that due to the touchy
nature of this specific source we will want to redact the
edits (which removes them from history too) so likely it
doesn't make sense to revert them manually. As the
changesets in question are easy to identify this should not
be a larger problem. <br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Unfortunately, this is correct. It looks like it'll be 133
users and 2257 changesets. I'm planning to leave messages in
changeset discussions on their most recent changesets. </blockquote>
<br>
Just a quick update: I have left the message and translation by
최규성 on the changeset discussions and begun the redactions. I
estimate it will take over two weeks to redact everything.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Redacting the changesets is now 50% done. <br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
All vworld redactions are complete.<br>
</body>
</html>