<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>7 cze 2022, 17:28 od albertas.agejevas@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div><br></div><div class=""><div class="" dir="ltr">On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 3:20 PM Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-lt <<a href="mailto:talk-lt@openstreetmap.org" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">talk-lt@openstreetmap.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex" class=""><div><div dir="auto">It is also, obviously, causing cartographic issues only when secondary and<br></div><div dir="auto"><div>tertiary roads are shown differently.<br></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>One man's cartographic issues is another man's useful information. As a rule, renderers don't regard the surface when rendering roads, but for me as a road user, for example, planning bike journeys, the visual distinction is very useful. However, in principle I could agree. Our practice is probably an instance of tagging for a renderer, and the same road alternating between secondary and tertiary is not ideal.<br></div><div><br></div><div>As for the official road category not matching the actual importance, do you have any concrete examples in mind?<br></div><div><br></div><div>Albertas<br></div></div></div></blockquote><div dir="auto">For example <br></div><div dir="auto"><a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/54.8611/23.0654">https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/54.8611/23.0654</a><br></div><div dir="auto"><a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/114389023#map=15/55.6933/24.1503">https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/114389023#map=15/55.6933/24.1503</a><br></div><div dir="auto"><a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/55.7962/24.2207">https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/55.7962/24.2207</a><br></div><div dir="auto"><a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154294096#map=15/56.1228/21.3064">https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154294096#map=15/56.1228/21.3064</a><br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">this is much weaker claim, but it was at least a bit suprising to me<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">in my experience highway=secondary is rather used for connection between<br></div><div dir="auto">bigger settlements, with highway=tertiary for connection between smaller ones<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">But maybe in this case Poland is on the other side and should use highway=secondary<br></div><div dir="auto">more often? Or has different urban structure?<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Definitely disjointed highway=secondary roads are more unusual and surprising part.<br></div> </body>
</html>