<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Nov 13, 2022, 16:18 by tomasstraupis@gmail.com:<br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div>Hello<br></div><div><br></div><div> Could you be more precise on the process? Are you going to check if<br></div><div>wikidata is appropriate for the object? Quite a number of wikipedia<br></div><div>tags have been removed because they were not suitable for the object<br></div><div>but wikidata was left behind because a lot of people do not understand<br></div><div>therefore ignore wikidata tag.<br></div></blockquote><div dir="auto">For now I am just asking what should be listed in<br></div><div dir="auto"><a href="https://matkoniecz.github.io/OSM-wikipedia-tag-validator-reports/">https://matkoniecz.github.io/OSM-wikipedia-tag-validator-reports/</a><br></div><div dir="auto">and Lithuania-specific pages.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">I would make bot edit only in case that there would be a clear agreement<br></div><div dir="auto">that<br></div><div dir="auto">- (1) wikipedia and wikidata tags are useful to add when only one of<br></div><div dir="auto">the is present<br></div><div dir="auto">- (2) bot edits in Lithuania can be made by people not speaking<br></div><div dir="auto">local language<br></div><div dir="auto">- (3) this specific bot edits is welcome<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">And there would be specific bot edit proposal clearly proposing that,<br></div><div dir="auto">with documentation of bot edit for review.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">But yes, any entries detected as dubious, conflicting, invalid would<br></div><div dir="auto">not be modified and only listed for human review like ones at<br></div><div dir="auto"><a href="https://matkoniecz.github.io/OSM-wikipedia-tag-validator-reports/Lietuva%20(Lithuania%20-%20Litwa).html">https://matkoniecz.github.io/OSM-wikipedia-tag-validator-reports/Lietuva%20(Lithuania%20-%20Litwa).html</a><br></div><div dir="auto">are listed for Lithuania - and would be skipped from bot edits.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">That is how<br></div><div dir="auto"><a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Mateusz_Konieczny_-_bot_account/adding_wikidata_tags_based_on_wikipedia_tags_in_Poland">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Mateusz_Konieczny_-_bot_account/adding_wikidata_tags_based_on_wikipedia_tags_in_Poland</a><br></div><div dir="auto"><a href="https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Mateusz_Konieczny_-_bot_account/adding_wikipedia_tags_based_on_wikidata_tags_in_Poland">https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Mateusz_Konieczny_-_bot_account/adding_wikipedia_tags_based_on_wikidata_tags_in_Poland</a><br></div><div dir="auto">are operating for few years <br></div><blockquote class="tutanota_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid #93A3B8; padding-left: 10px; margin-left: 5px;"><div> If you're thinking about automated non reviewed update then I'm 99%<br></div><div>sure it is a bad idea (which was already tried and then reverted).<br></div></blockquote><div dir="auto">I wanted to start from (1) - because if there is no agreement that such<br></div><div dir="auto">edits are improvement then entire idea should be skipped.<br></div><div dir="auto">And I would disable checking and updating this class of issues in<br></div><div dir="auto">Lithuania as they are not considered as a problem in this area.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Or maybe list them on page for human review, if this community<br></div><div dir="auto">considers such changes as improvement but requiring human review.<br></div> </body>
</html>