<HTML>
<BODY>
Thanks, I have to remove my old Mt. Apo National Park data.<br>
<br>
murlwe<br>
<-----Original Message-----> <br>
>From: maning sambale [emmanuel.sambale@gmail.com]<br>
>Sent: 7/2/2009 9:23:29 AM<br>
>To: talk-ph@openstreetmap.org<br>
>Subject: Re: [talk-ph] RFC: importing protected areas/ nationalparksboundaries<br>
><br>
>It's done!<br>
><br>
>http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/1705598<br>
><br>
>@ noel, Mount Kanlaon is included<br>
>http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/37121643<br>
>@ edwaypointsdotph, Lake Balinsasayao is also included<br>
>http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/37121637<br>
>@ murlwe, Moutn Apo is included<br>
>http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/37121639 as well as a<br>
>multiploygon relation to exclude PNOC<br>
>http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/165773<br>
><br>
>On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:07 AM, maning<br>
>sambale<emmanuel.sambale@gmail.com> wrote:<br>
>> Last call for any comments on the planned national park/protected area<br>
>> boundaries. Anyone?<br>
>><br>
>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 5:48 PM, maning<br>
>> sambale<emmanuel.sambale@gmail.com> wrote:<br>
>>> Fineprint:<br>
>>> Source: PAWB-DENR, CI Philippines<br>
>>> Restriction: No restriction of use<br>
>>> Date: 12/08/00<br>
>>> Citation: Data Source: Participants of the Philippine Biodiversity<br>
>Conservation<br>
>>> Priority-Setting Workshop, December 4 - 8, 2000<br>
>>> Scale: 1:7,500,000<br>
>>><br>
>>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Marloue<br>
>Pidor<murlwe@mail2engineer.com> wrote:<br>
>>>> Maning,<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Where did you get this data I just want to know the sections of the<br>
>Mt. Apo<br>
>>>> National Park. Based on RA 9237 Mt. Apo National Park have 3<br>
>section that<br>
>>>> includes the north-west and south-east buffer zones. Based on the shape<br>
>>>> file, it is already merged.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> murlwe<br>
>>>> <-----Original Message-----><br>
>>>>>From: maning sambale [emmanuel.sambale@gmail.com]<br>
>>>>>Sent: 6/14/2009 3:27:21 PM<br>
>>>>>To: talk-ph@openstreetmap.org<br>
>>>>>Subject: Re: [talk-ph] RFC: importing protected areas/ national<br>
>>>>> parksboundaries<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>>Hi,<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>>Here is the protected area shapefile I intend to upload in OSM. I<br>
>>>>>removed some PAs whom I think has "improper" polygon boundaries.<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>>Please review if you think this is suitable for OSM import.<br>
>>>>>Download link:<br>
>>>>> http://esambale.wikispaces.com/file/view/protected_areas_edited.zip<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>>On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:20 PM, maning<br>
>>>>>sambale<emmanuel.sambale@gmail.com> wrote:<br>
>>>>>>> Is it Mount Kanlaon National Park included? If we<br>
>include those<br>
>>>>>national park it would be much interesting for those who who use<br>
>OSM for<br>
>>>>>biodiversity conservation.<br>
>>>>>> Not sure, but I think it is. Right, in some areas there are<br>
>no road<br>
>>>>>> data simply because the are not much road in the first<br>
>place. It<br>
>>>>>> would be good for other data users (like conservationist)<br>
>to be able<br>
>>>>>> to use the data for their purpose. Some important features<br>
>I dream of<br>
>>>>>> adding:<br>
>>>>>> 1. rivers<br>
>>>>>> 2. landcover (different from landuse)<br>
>>>>>> 3. coral reefs<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> This can be mapped using landsat by the way.<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>> thanks.<br>
>>>>>> > noel<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 6:33 AM, maning<br>
>>>>>> sambale<emmanuel.sambale@gmail.com> wrote:<br>
>>>>>>> Not good enough:<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3368/3595795759_20a6a76358_o.png<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>> It seems small protected areas were marked as large<br>
>squares just to<br>
>>>>>>> appear on the 1:7M scale map.<br>
>>>>>>> Still other boundaries are good. Need to edit first,<br>
>before import.<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:36 AM, maning sambale<br>
>>>>>>> <emmanuel.sambale@gmail.com> wrote:<br>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar<br>
>>>>><seav80@gmail.com> wrote:<br>
>>>>>>>>> Should we add them? Why not?<br>
>>>>>>>> OK, I will send a sample file for everyone to look<br>
>at before adding<br>
>>>>>them.<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> I'm thinking of including additional tag, for example:<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> name=Northern Sierra Madre Natural Park<br>
>>>>>>>> boundary=national_park<br>
>>>>>>>> NIPAS:category=natural park # this link for ref:<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>http://sunsite.nus.edu.sg/apcel/dbase/filipino/primary/phanip.html<br>
>>>>>>>> source=PBCPP, 2002 # this is the actual source of<br>
>publication<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> Is this OK, or any better tag for this?<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>> I think these are the same shapefiles that<br>
>Microsoft Encarta<br>
>>>>>used in its<br>
>>>>>>>>> Atlas component and the same ones imported into<br>
>Google Maps/Map<br>
>>>>>Maker. For<br>
>>>>>>>>> instance look at the following Google Maps links:<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>> Biak-na-Bato National Park:<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&ll=15.11853,121.087189&spn=0.082363,0.175781&z=13<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> We have way better boundary of Biak na Bato:<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=15.1417&lon=121.099&zoom=13&layers=B000FTF<br>
>>>>>>>> (I know because I stayed there for a few years)<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 5:33 PM, maning sambale<br>
>>>>><emmanuel.sambale@gmail.com><br>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:<br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,<br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>> I found this in my gis database:<br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>> 123pas_ini_unproc.shp Unproclaimed<br>
>protected areas as initial<br>
>>>>>>>>>> components vis-a-vis integrated terrestrial<br>
>and inland<br>
>>>>>water priority<br>
>>>>>>>>>> areas.<br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>> 2pas_unproc_addl.shp Unproclaimed Protected<br>
>areas as additional<br>
>>>>>>>>>> components vis-a-vis integrated terrestrial<br>
>and inland<br>
>>>>>water priority<br>
>>>>>>>>>> areas.<br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>> 36pa_iniunproc_ver.shp Unproclaimed<br>
>protected areas<br>
>>>>>>>>>> with boundaries for verification as initial<br>
>components<br>
>>>>>vis-a-vis<br>
>>>>>>>>>> integrated terrestrial and inland water<br>
>priority areas.<br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>> 83pas_proc.shp Proclaimed protected areas<br>
>vis-a-vis integrated<br>
>>>>>>>>>> terrestrial and inland water priority areas.<br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>> Fineprint:<br>
>>>>>>>>>> Source: PAWB-DENR, CI Philippines<br>
>>>>>>>>>> Restriction: No restriction of use<br>
>>>>>>>>>> Date: 12/08/00<br>
>>>>>>>>>> Citation: Data Source: Participants of the<br>
>Philippine<br>
>>>>>Biodiversity<br>
>>>>>>>>>> Conservation<br>
>>>>>>>>>> Prior<br>
><br>
>=== message truncated ===
</BODY></HTML>
<span id=m2wTl><p><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2" style="font-size:13.5px">_______________________________________________________________<BR>Get the Free email that has everyone talking at <a href=http://www.mail2world.com target=new>http://www.mail2world.com</a><br> <font color=#999999>Unlimited Email Storage – POP3 – Calendar – SMS – Translator – Much More!</font></font></span>