<HTML>
<BODY>
Don't be sorry your import is better. Do not remove your import I based it on a paper map I guess its not really accurate. Maning, I will be going to Manila this July 9-16 can we meet (when & where) I will return your GPStogo. <br>
<br>
Bdw, we will be having our micro mapping party tomorrow.<br>
<br>
murlwe<br>
<-----Original Message-----> <br>
>From: maning sambale [emmanuel.sambale@gmail.com]<br>
>Sent: 7/2/2009 5:26:38 PM<br>
>To: murlwe@mail2engineer.com<br>
>Cc: talk-ph@openstreetmap.org<br>
>Subject: Re: [talk-ph] RFC: importing protected areas/ nationalparksboundaries<br>
><br>
>murlwe,<br>
><br>
>I just saw the render of boundary=national_park.<br>
>There seems to be a previous boundary of Mt. Apo. I'm sorry for the<br>
>duplicate, should I remove my import?<br>
><br>
>I'm not sure which data is a better.<br>
><br>
>On 7/2/09, Marloue Pidor <murlwe@mail2engineer.com> wrote:<br>
>> Thanks, I have to remove my old Mt. Apo National Park data.<br>
>><br>
>> murlwe<br>
>> <-----Original Message-----><br>
>>>From: maning sambale [emmanuel.sambale@gmail.com]<br>
>>>Sent: 7/2/2009 9:23:29 AM<br>
>>>To: talk-ph@openstreetmap.org<br>
>>>Subject: Re: [talk-ph] RFC: importing protected areas/<br>
>> nationalparksboundaries<br>
>>><br>
>>>It's done!<br>
>>><br>
>>>http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/1705598<br>
>>><br>
>>>@ noel, Mount Kanlaon is included<br>
>>>http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/37121643<br>
>>>@ edwaypointsdotph, Lake Balinsasayao is also included<br>
>>>http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/37121637<br>
>>>@ murlwe, Moutn Apo is included<br>
>>>http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/37121639 as well as a<br>
>>>multiploygon relation to exclude PNOC<br>
>>>http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/165773<br>
>>><br>
>>>On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:07 AM, maning<br>
>>>sambale<emmanuel.sambale@gmail.com> wrote:<br>
>>>> Last call for any comments on the planned national park/protected<br>
>> area<br>
>>>> boundaries. Anyone?<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 5:48 PM, maning<br>
>>>> sambale<emmanuel.sambale@gmail.com> wrote:<br>
>>>>> Fineprint:<br>
>>>>> Source: PAWB-DENR, CI Philippines<br>
>>>>> Restriction: No restriction of use<br>
>>>>> Date: 12/08/00<br>
>>>>> Citation: Data Source: Participants of the Philippine Biodiversity<br>
>>>Conservation<br>
>>>>> Priority-Setting Workshop, December 4 - 8, 2000<br>
>>>>> Scale: 1:7,500,000<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Marloue<br>
>>>Pidor<murlwe@mail2engineer.com> wrote:<br>
>>>>>> Maning,<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> Where did you get this data I just want to know the<br>
>sections of the<br>
>>>Mt. Apo<br>
>>>>>> National Park. Based on RA 9237 Mt. Apo National Park have 3<br>
>>>section that<br>
>>>>>> includes the north-west and south-east buffer zones. Based<br>
>on the<br>
>> shape<br>
>>>>>> file, it is already merged.<br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>><br>
>>>>>> murlwe<br>
>>>>>> <-----Original Message-----><br>
>>>>>>>From: maning sambale [emmanuel.sambale@gmail.com]<br>
>>>>>>>Sent: 6/14/2009 3:27:21 PM<br>
>>>>>>>To: talk-ph@openstreetmap.org<br>
>>>>>>>Subject: Re: [talk-ph] RFC: importing protected areas/<br>
>national<br>
>>>>>>> parksboundaries<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>Hi,<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>Here is the protected area shapefile I intend to upload<br>
>in OSM. I<br>
>>>>>>>removed some PAs whom I think has "improper" polygon<br>
>boundaries.<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>Please review if you think this is suitable for OSM import.<br>
>>>>>>>Download link:<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>> http://esambale.wikispaces.com/file/view/protected_areas_edited.zip<br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:20 PM, maning<br>
>>>>>>>sambale<emmanuel.sambale@gmail.com> wrote:<br>
>>>>>>>>> Is it Mount Kanlaon National Park included? If we<br>
>>>include those<br>
>>>>>>>national park it would be much interesting for those who<br>
>who use<br>
>>>OSM for<br>
>>>>>>>biodiversity conservation.<br>
>>>>>>>> Not sure, but I think it is. Right, in some areas<br>
>there are<br>
>>>no road<br>
>>>>>>>> data simply because the are not much road in the first<br>
>>>place. It<br>
>>>>>>>> would be good for other data users (like<br>
>conservationist)<br>
>>>to be able<br>
>>>>>>>> to use the data for their purpose. Some important<br>
>features<br>
>>>I dream of<br>
>>>>>>>> adding:<br>
>>>>>>>> 1. rivers<br>
>>>>>>>> 2. landcover (different from landuse)<br>
>>>>>>>> 3. coral reefs<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> This can be mapped using landsat by the way.<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>> thanks.<br>
>>>>>>>> > noel<br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 6:33 AM, maning<br>
>>>>>>>> sambale<emmanuel.sambale@gmail.com> wrote:<br>
>>>>>>>>> Not good enough:<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3368/3595795759_20a6a76358_o.png<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>> It seems small protected areas were marked as large<br>
>>>squares just to<br>
>>>>>>>>> appear on the 1:7M scale map.<br>
>>>>>>>>> Still other boundaries are good. Need to edit<br>
>first,<br>
>>>before import.<br>
>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:36 AM, maning sambale<br>
>>>>>>>>> <emmanuel.sambale@gmail.com> wrote:<br>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Eugene<br>
>Alvin Villar<br>
>>>>>>><seav80@gmail.com> wrote:<br>
>>>>>>>>>>> Should we add them? Why not?<br>
>>>>>>>>>> OK, I will send a sample file for everyone<br>
>to look<br>
>>>at before adding<br>
>>>>>>>them.<br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm thinking of including additional tag,<br>
>for example:<br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>> name=Northern Sierra Madre Natural Park<br>
>>>>>>>>>> boundary=national_park<br>
>>>>>>>>>> NIPAS:category=natural park # this link for<br>
>ref:<br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>http://sunsite.nus.edu.sg/apcel/dbase/filipino/primary/phanip.html<br>
>>>>>>>>>> source=PBCPP, 2002 # this is the actual<br>
>source of<br>
>>>publication<br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>> Is this OK, or any better tag for this?<br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>>> I think these are the same shapefiles that<br>
>>>Microsoft Encarta<br>
>>>>>>>used in its<br>
>>>>>>>>>>> Atlas component and the same ones<br>
>imported into<br>
>>>Google Maps/Map<br>
>>>>>>>Maker. For<br>
>>>>>>>>>>> instance look at the following Google<br>
>Maps links:<br>
>>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>>> Biak-na-Bato National Park:<br>
>>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>http://maps.google.com/?ie=UTF8&ll=15.11853,121.087189&spn=0.082363<br>
>> ,0.175781&z=13<br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>> We have way better boundary of Biak na Bato:<br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=15.1417&lon=121.099&zoom=13&layer<br>
>> s=B000FTF<br>
>>>>>>>>>> (I know because I stayed there for a few years)<br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>><br>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 5:33 PM, maning<br>
>sambale<br>
>>><br>
><br>
>=== message truncated ===
</BODY></HTML>
<span id=m2wTl><p><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2" style="font-size:13.5px">_______________________________________________________________<BR>Get the Free email that has everyone talking at <a href=http://www.mail2world.com target=new>http://www.mail2world.com</a><br> <font color=#999999>Unlimited Email Storage – POP3 – Calendar – SMS – Translator – Much More!</font></font></span>