<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2013-10-31 23:55, Ervin Malicdem
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CALqAQoF7higPCww4pENN+4djg7VVO=7fDX4bda_sNn+8YAG2rA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div><i>What tag to use for fish ponds.</i><br>
</div>
As fish thrives in water i suggest natural:water ;
crop=fish<br>
<br>
</div>
<i>Poultry farms</i><br>
</div>
landuse:farmland ; crop:chicken<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
Thanks, that's useful.<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CALqAQoF7higPCww4pENN+4djg7VVO=7fDX4bda_sNn+8YAG2rA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div><br>
<br>
</div>
<div><i>Waterway tagging (suggestion) :</i><br>
</div>
<div>Rivers: if the width of the flowing body of water seems to
be wider than 50 meters and deeper than 10 meters<br>
</div>
<div>streams: if smaller than my concept of a river<br>
</div>
<div>irrigation canal: a stream if it is natural ; a drain if it
is artificial<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
Is this the canonical definition of a river? If it is, I need to
redefine a lot of rivers! I tend to mark it as a river if it has a
name that includes the word "river" or if most people refer to it as
"the river" or "sapa", but downgrade it to stream around the place
it becomes so small that you can (easily) drive across it - where
there is a ford. Admittedly, I drive across rivers too (at least my
definition of river), but that's just because I like to play in
water (and find it fascinating to get stuck occationally)...<br>
Would you say that here in Pampanga, it's pretty much only Pampanga
river that is a river and that everything else is a stream?<br>
</body>
</html>