<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?><html><head><style type="text/css"><![CDATA[#x3e6ba7d4d9a747749c6236b8df248817{
font-family:Tahoma;
font-size:12pt;
}#x75b553df90ab410d923eaed38e023816{
font-family:Tahoma;
font-size:12pt;
}]]><!--blockquote.cite2, #x7266234bc3f34df blockquote.cite2
{margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 0px; padding-left: 10px; padding-right: 0px; border-left-width: 1px; border-left-style: solid; border-left-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); margin-top: 3px; padding-top: 0px;}
body, #x7266234bc3f34df #xe40ca43b466048d4b24ca1d168621a58, #x7266234bc3f34df
{font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 12pt;}
--></style></head><body><div><br /></div><div>During early April I looked at nodes/ways/relations tagged as landuse=farm as reclassified many of them as appropriate.</div><div><br /></div><div>Howver , in some places I noted that individual fields had been tagged using landuse = farm,<span style="font-size: 12pt;"> for example:</span></div><div><br /></div><div><a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/11.225924767247454/124.54216374231005" style="font-size: 12pt;">https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/11.225924767247454/124.54216374231005</a></div><div><a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/16.933969/121.13637">https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/16.933969/121.13637</a></div><div><a href="https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/14.883274660783613/120.25851326487962">https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/14.883274660783613/120.25851326487962</a></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>At present I have done nothing with these ways</div><div><br /></div><div>The standard use in OSM for landuse=farmland is for it to be used on larger areas, rather than individual fields</div><div><br /></div><div>There appears to be no approved tag in OSM for fields, (though <a href="https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/field#values">taginfo</a> shows field=yes used on 388 occasions worldwide)</div><div><br /></div><div>There seem to be a number of possibilities regarding these ways:</div><div><br /></div><div>1) retag them as landuse=farmland</div><div>2) delete them and draw a single way round the larger outline of all the adjacent fields and tag this as landuse=farmland</div><div>3) retag <span style="font-size: 12pt;"> them as field=yes, and also </span><span style="font-size: 12pt;">draw a single way round the larger outline of all the adjacent fields and tag this as landuse=farmland.</span></div><div><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><br /></span></div><div><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Of these I think I favour approach 3 as it keeps the field data in OSM (someone might have a use for this)</span></div><div><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><br /></span></div><div>What are your thoughts?</div><div><br /></div><div>Regards</div><div><br /></div><div>David</div><div><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><br /></span></div><div><br /></div><div id="signature_old"></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div>
<div>------ Original Message ------</div>
<div>From: "David Groom" <<a href="mailto:reviews@pacific-rim.net">reviews@pacific-rim.net</a>></div>
<div>To: "OpenStreetMap Philippines" <<a href="mailto:talk-ph@openstreetmap.org">talk-ph@openstreetmap.org</a>></div>
<div>Sent: 31/03/2017 12:23:53</div>
<div>Subject: Re: [talk-ph] landuse = farm</div><div><br /></div>
<div id="x7266234bc3f34df"><blockquote cite="em368ea2b6-780f-40fa-bf74-7f3759c04cb7@office-win10" type="cite" class="cite2">
<div><div id="xe40ca43b466048d4b24ca1d168621a58"><div><div>I don't think it will take too long for one person to do this, but I may be mistaken.</div><div><br /></div><div>It will also be an opportunity to look at some of the areas tagged as "landuse = farm", and merge them into adjacent areas where appropriate.</div></div><div><br /></div><div>David</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div></div></div>
<div>------ Original Message ------</div>
<div>From: "Eugene Alvin Villar" <<a href="mailto:seav80@gmail.com">seav80@gmail.com</a>></div>
<div>To: "David Groom" <<a href="mailto:reviews@pacific-rim.net">reviews@pacific-rim.net</a>></div>
<div>Cc: "OpenStreetMap Philippines" <<a href="mailto:talk-ph@openstreetmap.org">talk-ph@openstreetmap.org</a>></div>
<div>Sent: 30/03/2017 00:56:18</div>
<div>Subject: Re: [talk-ph] landuse = farm</div><div><br /></div>
<div id="x852e41b0d79d4a2"><blockquote cite="CAPhqi6Jw5w5M+kLJf+HrtkG6BjXX_FxgfvhVw=YJ9sqM516ovA@mail.gmail.com" type="cite" class="cite2">
<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 10:06 PM, David Groom <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:reviews@pacific-rim.net">reviews@pacific-rim.net</a>></span> wrote:<br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><u></u><br /><div>Shall I start looking at the relations and ways and change where appropriate from "landuse = farm" to "landuse = farmland"?<div><br /></div><div>What do you think?</div></div></blockquote><div><br /></div><div>Go for it! Would it also make sense to turn this into a Maproulette task?<br /><br /></div><div>~Eugene <br /></div></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div>
</body></html>